control-toolbox VS teb_local_planner

Compare control-toolbox vs teb_local_planner and see what are their differences.

teb_local_planner

An optimal trajectory planner considering distinctive topologies for mobile robots based on Timed-Elastic-Bands (ROS Package) (by rst-tu-dortmund)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
control-toolbox teb_local_planner
1 1
1,363 964
5.1% 2.6%
0.0 2.5
over 1 year ago 24 days ago
C++ C++
BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

control-toolbox

Posts with mentions or reviews of control-toolbox. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-09-21.

teb_local_planner

Posts with mentions or reviews of teb_local_planner. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.
  • best algorithm [ indoor service robots ]
    1 project | /r/ROS | 2 Sep 2022
    For the local planner/controller, which seems to be the meat of your problem here: I'd say in dynamic environments TEB is generally good (https://github.com/rst-tu-dortmund/teb_local_planner), BUT tuning it usually gets convoluted. Changing one parameter may have propagated effects throughout the algorithm. If you want to strictly follow your global path, I wouldn't really advise it.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing control-toolbox and teb_local_planner you can also consider the following projects:

libmpc - libmpc++ is a C++ header-only library to solve linear and non-linear MPC

Fields2Cover - Robust and efficient coverage paths for autonomous agricultural vehicles. A modular and extensible Coverage Path Planning library

pinocchio - A fast and flexible implementation of Rigid Body Dynamics algorithms and their analytical derivatives

turtlebot3_simulations - Simulations for TurtleBot3

Robotics Library (RL) - The Robotics Library (RL) is a self-contained C++ library for rigid body kinematics and dynamics, motion planning, and control.

navigation - ROS Navigation stack. Code for finding where the robot is and how it can get somewhere else.

QDriverStation - Cross-platform clone of the FRC Driver Station

towr - A light-weight, Eigen-based C++ library for trajectory optimization for legged robots.

ifopt - An Eigen-based, light-weight C++ Interface to Nonlinear Programming Solvers (Ipopt, Snopt)

Assemble-Them-All - [SIGGRAPH Asia 2022] Assemble Them All: Physics-Based Planning for Generalizable Assembly by Disassembly

CppRobotics - Header-only C++ library for robotics, control, and path planning algorithms. Work in progress, contributions are welcome!

fields2cover_ros - A ROS interface of Fields2Cover