shadertoy-rs VS luminance-rs

Then, as you probably noticed, I also added my not-emulable-games-but-id-still-like-to-have-them-in-there-and-its-pretty. I added PS4, PS5, Switch games manually. Thankfully I don't buy enough of them these days that it becomes a problem to sync. As for launching, well, the TV is plugged to them. Still, they needed to be launchable (otherwise Launchbox is unhappy). What I did was fork shadertoy-rs (https://github.com/fmenozzi/shadertoy-rs). to add capabilities for randomized shaders and displaying a title. All these shaders are animated, look great in fullscreen and serve as a nice little distraction as you start up whatever console. shadertoy-rs also closes on any input, so it's easy to get back to the list. Need to also add automatically the author and the shader name for more flair. The current list of whitelisted shaders that I have on random are (beware, some of them might be a bit cpu intensive):

gives me same vibes as https://github.com/phaazon/luminance-rs

Potentially it is due to this layout optimization and a missing repr(C) somewhere in your code or a dependency. For example, here is an is a related issue in luminance.

luminance is a graphics ecosystem focusing on type-safe and type-level API. This is part of a blog article series describing the process of redesign the API to update it to how I see things today, trying to fix several flaws of the previous design, and bring more simplicity to developers.

The WebGL API might be what you are looking for if you are building a game. It supports textures, vertex buffers, and shaders. luminance-rs has a backend: https://github.com/phaazon/luminance-rs/tree/master/examples/web

There is no GUI framework used -- it is built on GLFW and Luminance. This is after using winit and wgpu for some time.

This list is really cool! I've had a lot of success with luminance - which is a mid-level graphics library (vertex buffers, shaders, etc). It has OpenGL and WebGL backends.