riscv-isa-sim VS riscv-arch-test

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but Spike is considered the gold standard for RISV-V simulation, in terms of support for extensions and overall correctness. As I understand it, QEMU is faster and easier to use for day-to-day for general software development.

Spike is an RISC-V instruction set simulator: https://github.com/riscv-software-src/riscv-isa-sim

I really like the source code for the Spike RISC-V ISA Simulator. It's not very heavily commented, though, so you really need to read the code.

If you want to run bare metal with no RTOS, it should be possible, but you will need to replace the main startup program (https://github.com/riscv-software-src/riscv-isa-sim/blob/master/spike_main/spike.cc) with some program to set up the hardware and instantiate the simulator, load the OS image etc and then have a decent runtime environment to that supports malloc() etc and redirect IO to serial or flash memory etc. There is a bit of work you would need to do.

I guess you will also use Spike and the Sail model for RISC-V.

git: https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-arch-test.git commit: 6d87f30 (current master)

There's also https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-arch-test, which I think is using similar tests to riscof (some generated by riscv_ctg) just an older framework to run it all.

Prior notice, I work for a professor and he wants me to test/verify a riscv simulation model, which is programmed in VHDL. He referred to the https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-arch-test , to look up how I have to set up a test.

This is the current compliance test repository. https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/riscv-arch-test

Have you tried running the RISC-V architectural test suite: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-arch-test? It should fit pretty nicely with your test system, each test generates a signature that needs to be checked against an expected output.

There are official RISC V tests you can run: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-compliance