bevy_xpbd VS Fyrox

Bevy XPBD will move away from the XPBD solver in coming months, which is worth bearing in mind if you are considering using it for your project.

[2]: https://github.com/Jondolf/bevy_xpbd/issues/346

Bevy XPBD is a 2D and 3D physics engine based on Extended Position Based Dynamics for the Bevy game engine. Unlike most other physics engines in the ecosystem, it uses the ECS directly, which removes the overhead of maintaining a separate physics world and makes the engine feel much more integrated into Bevy.

Cool! FYI, I just made a PR that adds support for applying a force at a point (and applying torque accordingly) if that's what you meant: https://github.com/Jondolf/bevy_xpbd/pull/58

Some other Rust game engines ship with their own physics engine. Fyrox, for example, has advanced 2D/3D physics, supporting rigid bodies, joints, ray casting and more. Godot too, which has community-led Rust bindings also has an in-built physics engine as well as a Godot-native extension using the Jolt physics engine. In fact, which is reported to be more performant than the official physics engine.

checkout https://fyrox.rs

I would say Bevy isn't really similar to Unity. Something like Fyrox - https://fyrox.rs/ - would be more similar. Bevy is more low level and lacks an editor (as of now, it's planned)

Fyrox might be an option, but for what you're looking (simple game logic, low performance concerns, desire for complete editor) for I'd probably choose Godot over it.

Besides Bevy there’s also Fyrox Engine that looks very promising. https://fyrox.rs/

We have our own engine. There aren't really full engines available in the Rust ecosystem. Bevy attempts to fill this, but it's far from being feature complete. There's also https://fyrox.rs/, but that's also work in progress. There's also https://rend3.rs/ which is just a 3d renderer, so you'll need to build the rest of the engine yourself.