o3de
Fyrox
o3de | Fyrox | |
---|---|---|
64 | 63 | |
7,350 | 7,242 | |
1.8% | 2.9% | |
9.9 | 9.9 | |
6 days ago | 1 day ago | |
C++ | Rust | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
o3de
- Amazon Lays Off 180 Employees in Its Games Division
- Not only Unity...
- O3DE FOSS 3D Engine
-
O3DE
It's odd to me that when the whole Unity fiasco happened, everyone was basically looking at either Godot or Unreal, but pretty much nobody mentioned or cared for something like O3DE.
If you praise Godot for being open source a lot, then it stands to reason that you should similarly prefer O3DE as opposed to Unreal: https://github.com/o3de/o3de/blob/development/LICENSE.txt (no idea why they're going for both Apache 2 and MIT license, though) vs https://www.unrealengine.com/en-US/license
Unless people just care about the options that are popular enough to warrant their attention and the features that they provide, whereas the licensing is actually a boon, rather than the main factor, given that Unreal also did some slight price increases a while later as well: https://www.unreal-university.blog/post/unreal-engine-5-pric...
Either way, it's still nice to have lots of options available regardless of the licensing details (though this kind of does fragment developers among bunches of different projects), be it Godot, O3DE, Stride, Unreal or even something like jMonkeyEngine (one of the rare Java engines/editors with 3D) or NeoAxis (that one had a cool voxel LOD solution, but performance on AMD hardware was bad).
- Unreal Engine change its price for non-game apps
-
Alternative Game Engines for Marooned Unity Developers
03DE: Open source game engine, under Apache License 2.0, developed by Amazon and the linux foundation. Seems to work under a modular package called "gems", that you can use to pull in the functionality you need. It uses c++ as it's main language, but you can use Lua, python or visual scripting for scripting stuff. Has multiplayer built into the engine and what they call a "robust" system for open-world games. There seems to be a lot of tutorials on the site, but they aren't laid out great.
- List of Unity alternatives
- Unity: We Have Heard You
Fyrox
- Fyrox Game Engine – a Rust game engine with a real editor and scripting system
-
Rust Game Physics Engines: PhysX, Rapier, XPBD & Others
Some other Rust game engines ship with their own physics engine. Fyrox, for example, has advanced 2D/3D physics, supporting rigid bodies, joints, ray casting and more. Godot too, which has community-led Rust bindings also has an in-built physics engine as well as a Godot-native extension using the Jolt physics engine. In fact, which is reported to be more performant than the official physics engine.
-
Alternative Game Engines for Marooned Unity Developers
checkout https://fyrox.rs
- List of Unity alternatives
- Fyrox - A feature-rich game engine built in Rust.
-
“This Is a Disaster:” Game Developers Scramble to Deal with Unity’s New Fees
I would say Bevy isn't really similar to Unity. Something like Fyrox - https://fyrox.rs/ - would be more similar. Bevy is more low level and lacks an editor (as of now, it's planned)
- Fyrox Game Engine 0.31 is Out with Major Improvements in its Editor
-
Help me find my game engine!
Fyrox might be an option, but for what you're looking (simple game logic, low performance concerns, desire for complete editor) for I'd probably choose Godot over it.
-
What is Rust's potential in game development?
Besides Bevy there’s also Fyrox Engine that looks very promising. https://fyrox.rs/
-
NANOVOID Devlog #1: Lua Scripting
We have our own engine. There aren't really full engines available in the Rust ecosystem. Bevy attempts to fill this, but it's far from being feature complete. There's also https://fyrox.rs/, but that's also work in progress. There's also https://rend3.rs/ which is just a 3d renderer, so you'll need to build the rest of the engine yourself.
What are some alternatives?
Godot - Godot Engine – Multi-platform 2D and 3D game engine
bevy - A refreshingly simple data-driven game engine built in Rust
Ogre 3D - scene-oriented, flexible 3D engine (C++, Python, C#, Java)
Amazon Lumberyard - Amazon Lumberyard is a free AAA game engine deeply integrated with AWS and Twitch – with full source.
wgpu - Cross-platform, safe, pure-rust graphics api.
Game-Engine-Development-Series - Game Engine Development Series - Learn to code a Game Engine in C++ from scratch
macroquad - Cross-platform game engine in Rust.
FlaxEngine - Flax Engine – multi-platform 3D game engine
three-d - 2D/3D renderer - makes it simple to draw stuff across platforms (including web)
gdnative - Rust bindings for Godot 3