minimax VS black-parrot

On FPGAs, a register file probably fits better into distributed RAM than block RAM.

On Xilinx, for example: a 64-bit register file doesn't map efficiently to Xilinx's RAMB36 primitives. You'd need 2 RAMB36 primitives to provide a 64-bit wide memory with 1 write port and 2 read ports, each addressed separately. Only 6% (32 of 512) entries in each RAMB36 are ever addressable. It's this inefficient because ports, not memory cells, are the contented resource and BRAMs geometries aren't that elastic.

A 64-bit register file in distributed RAM, conversely, is a something like an array of DPRAM32 primitives (see, for example, UG474). Each register would still be stored multiple times to provide additional ports, but depending on the fabric, there's less (or no) unaddressed storage cells.

The Minimax RISC-V CPU (https://github.com/gsmecher/minimax; advertisement warning: my project) is what you get if you chase efficient mapping of FPGA memory primitives (both register-file and RAM) to a logical conclusion. Whether this is actually worth hyper-optimizing really depends on the application. Usually, it's not.

I haven't used it on a huge design (I'm usually a VHDL person), but it was a hassle-free replacement for iverilog when regression testing Minimax. Performance is substantially better; compilation times are worse.

Note that you can't compare LUT4 results (ZPU @ 440 LUTs) against LUT6 results (PicoRV32 @ 750 LUTs). The ZPU is remarkably small, and it's a bigger gap than a direct comparison shows.

SERV is a fair comparison, since it's architected for 4LUTs and I suspect the synthesis results come from iCE40 tools.

I have a contender in the "very small" space, too [1], although I don't claim it's as mature or complete as SERV. (If Minimax was excluded from your post on the basis of insanity, I'm OK with that.)

[1] https://github.com/gsmecher/minimax

I develop Minimax (https://github.com/gsmecher/minimax), an open-source RISC-V implementation. It's currently written in both VHDL and Verilog (the two implementations are equivalent, though I am likely to drop the VHDL implementation if it's too much work to keep them both.)

The best point-of-entry for "tiny" MCUs these days is FemtoRV32-Quark or SERV. I also maintain my own small RISC-V core (Minimax), though it's early on in graduating from "experiment" to "real design".

Another option is to have a single verilog testbench with clock and reset ports driven by verilator:https://github.com/black-parrot/black-parrot/blob/master/bp_top/test/tb/bp_tethered/test_bp.cpphttps://github.com/black-parrot/black-parrot/blob/master/bp_top/test/tb/bp_tethered/testbench.sv

It depends drastically on the core and configuration, but a default configured BlackParrot: https://github.com/black-parrot/black-parrot takes up about 50% of Z2 resources without any FPGA-specific tweaks.

Whoops, read the blog “no sram”. Would love to get my project https://github.com/black-parrot/black-parrot/tree/master on there. Do you have a sense for how many instances your flow could support? We use hardened srams for our caches which are minimally 8kB each at the moment.

What's your background? We have starting projects in a few areas on our RV64 multicore project: https://github.com/black-parrot/black-parrot

https://github.com/black-parrot/black-parrot has coherent I$/D$