stylus VS browser

Compare stylus vs browser and see what are their differences.


An Android web browser based on webview, which is specialized for E-Ink device. (by plateaukao)
Our great sponsors
  • Nanos - Run Linux Software Faster and Safer than Linux with Unikernels
  • Scout APM - A developer's best friend. Try free for 14-days
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
stylus browser
47 8
3,537 168
1.9% -
9.1 9.5
1 day ago 10 days ago
JavaScript Kotlin
GNU General Public License v3.0 only GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.


Posts with mentions or reviews of stylus. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-10-18.
  • YouTube: Filmmakers Presumed Guilty Until (Maybe) Proven Innocent | 2021-10-18
    That github page links to the dodgy extension "Stylish".

    The better one is called Stylus. The main difference being "Any and all analytics, telemetry, and data-collection have been removed completely. We'd rather not know what you're up to."

  • To anyone who's ever worked on a game wiki: thank you | 2021-09-26
    Highly recommend the Stylus Extension, which has a lot of user-created themes that improve sites. This one does pretty well to make Fandom sites usable (although it has issues with colors that make some pages/links absolutely unreadable, but that's a matter of wiki style clashing with user style).
  • Will there be customizable backrounds?
  • Heya, how do I give VGCats archive a dark background? | 2021-09-09
    You're referring to the browser add-on Stylus. This sub is about digital pens, which are commonly called "styluses".
  • Google search page with windows...can I make it always just show the classic Google logo? (Instead of whatever the latest thing is.) | 2021-09-05
  • The most underused browser feature | 2021-08-25
    > (The end user should apply their own CSS if wanted;

    I still remember the time when user styles were a first class feature built into all browsers. Hell, that 'C' in CSS, "Cascading", was always there to allow styles to enhance/override prior styles, including - at the top-level - to allow the user to override website's styling. Back before web designers ruined everything by making every web page into its own special snowflake, people thought users would have one-two default CSS sheets to choose from and apply to any webpage, the way we today think about "dark mode".

    These days, we have to resort to using browser extensions. A well-known one is Stylus [0][1]. In a way, it's much better than old built-in user styles. But then, it's not built in.


    [0] -

    [1] - Mind the name, it's "Stylus", not "Stylish" - the latter used to be popular, but then it sold out and become another peace of surveillance capitalism detritus. Stylus is a GPLv3 fork of Stylish with data collection removed.

  • Yeah, I might get the hang of removing the focus rings on edge now but where should I input the code and is there any additional codes I should 'inject' as well? | 2021-08-19
    Stylus add-on for Chrome works fine in Edge. Set that as a global style.
  • Automatically scale .gifv urls to fit the full window? | 2021-08-09
  • Wondering about some pinephone uses | 2021-08-09
    What about using Stylus on Firefox ?
  • Does anyone know how to change this back to the old icon? This one is super distracting, and I honestly find it quite ugly. | 2021-07-22
    if you use pc or laptop you can add a styleseet for youtube, use this extension called stylus - (it's open source) , then you can add custom css , so you them make a style sheet for and add this css .ytp-doubletap-static-circle { display: none !important; } this will hide the circle.


Posts with mentions or reviews of browser. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-08-25.
  • The most underused browser feature | 2021-08-25
    I'm a huge fan of Readability Mode and use it often. It's proof that Web design isn't the solution, Web design is the problem.

    For those who are using e-ink devices, or even just standard tablets, EInkBro is another immensely useful tool. Yes, it's a standalone browser, not a mode on Firefox, Safari, Vivalti, etc.

    (Available through Google Play, F-Droid and other sources. Android-only, sorry iOS fans.)

    What it offers over standard browsers is that it's optimised for e-ink displays. That is, it favours pagination over scrolling, runs to full-screen, can easily adjust font size up or down (no more itsy-bitsy-teen-weenie-yellow-polka-dot HN fonts), bold text, and has its own reader mode as well.

    Even on a standard tablet, some of these features are a huge step above and beyond the mainstream browsers.

    The feature-set is limited, some of the UI is a bit rough, and a few things are just plain broken (if you need to edit entries in the JS or Cookie enabled/disabled sites ... you have to delete all data and start over again).

    That said, my usage is evolving from sending individual pages to EInkBrow when I want to do long-form reading, to using it at least part-time as a primary browser. (Mozilla Fennec Fox is my first choice, still.) The browser is stable and very much usable despite this. The developer is responsive to requests and bug reports.

    What's most refreshing is that the design principle is readability of Web content, as determined by the user, and not by the page author or publisher.

  • ⟳ 6 apps added, 85 updated at
    EinkBro 8.12.1: lightweight, fast, but powerful browser designed for Eink devices.
  • We are drowning in churn and noise. I am fighting by switching this site to PDF | 2021-07-19
    Long sympathetic with the Jacob Nielsen / PDF bad camp ... I've had some recent changes of heart. Not a full convert, but PDF is often superior to HTML, especially for longer-form and complex noninteractive content.

    Books are an artefact whose design has evolved over the centuries to accommodate human-scale ergonomics: font size, paper and ink colour, words per line, lines per page, pages per volume, overall weight and dimensions. Standard-sized books are all larger than the largest current mobile phones, with diagonal measures of about 9--12 inches. There are smaller and larger books, but those are compromises either to portability (pocketbooks) or to large-format resolution and detail ("coffee table" books, atlases, and the like). Magazines tend to run even larger (about 13"), broadsheet newspapers larger yet. Most criticisms of PDFs are actually criticisms of the devices and displays used to read them.

    Poor resolution, incorrect aspect ratios, and small display sizes (especially mobile devices) are the key problems.

    Reading PDFs on a tablet, especially a larger e-ink device, is a game-changer. I now actively avoid HTML, or at least launch it in a browser designed with e-ink in mind (EInkBro: Otherwise, my large (13.3") high-DPI (200+) B&W ebook reader is an excellent long-form immersive reading tool.

    The key requirement of a mobile phone is that it fit in a pocket, handbag, or purse. They are too small for reading, and aren't designed for that purpose. Current devices feature screen sizes of roughly 5--7 inches (diagonal measurement). At the lower end, that's smaller than a 3x5 index card (6"), and the largest barely the size of a 4x6 card (7").

    On desktops, the first display that offered what I felt was a truly comfortable two-pages-up PDF reading experience was the 27" Retina iMac. Its 5K display (itself an oddball size) suits document work well. Even not fully maximised, most books are highly readable (leaving screen space for other tasks), and at full maximisation, details really stand out especially from scans of historical editions. (Such details aren't always relevent, but often are.)

    PDF also provides capabilities HTML either cannot or does not by default (and few seem to be persuaded to offer), especially pagination, formulae, and a spatially-persistent layout (if you have a spatial memory, this is very valuable).

    PDFs can though often do not include internal navigation (chapters, sections, etc.), search (if full text is included), and most critically, metadata (at a minimum, author, title, date, and publisher, see the full Dublin Core metadata specification for what should be required).

    PDFs can also be published directly to device sizes (or to a set of form factors encompassing typical devices), as several others note.

    Some of the issues aren't entirely intrinsic, and my feeling is that wider use of PDFs for online content would lead to a proliferation of PDF annoyances to match present-day Web annoyances. In each case, the fundamental problem is that publishers rather than readers have final say over presentation. An alternative, of distributing raw minimum markup and formatting that to user specifications following a set number of templates ... might help.

    It's ironic that the article here embodies a number of PDF annoyances:

    - The shaded background renders quite poorly on a B&W e-ink reader (though can be eliminated with a watermark-removal setting).

    - The filename provides no clues as to contents or provenance, and is likely to collide with other content.

    - I'm a fan of serif fonts, not sans serif, for high-DPI reading.

    - Internal and external hyperlink support is ... variable. At times utterly missing, at others, inconsistent or inconvenient.

    - PDFs are not trivially directly editable, which means both authors and readers can change errors or address issues.

    - Many PDFs lack internal structure, even where the document they encompass do. The number of books lacking PDF table-of-contents support is ... large.

    - Metadata standards and practices are abysmal. See the Dublin Core standards.

    - Naming conventions similarly. "Report", "Resume", "Project", or "0.pdf" are names which should never be used. Describe author, content, and date, as a minimum, if possible.

  • An Android web browser based on webview, which is specialized for E-Ink device | 2021-07-13
  • Einkbro: Android E-ink device specific Browser – pagination keys; reader mode | 2021-04-19
  • E-Ink Browser | 2021-03-23
  • Inkpad Color mini review : the colored dream is still far away | 2021-03-12
    Nova Pro is a bit old with less powerful CPU. On Hisense Eink phones, or newer Onyx devices, the refresh quality is getting better. Although scrolling in normal mode is still not smooth enough to act as a normal tablet, I developed a browser to support page turn behavior that could replace scrolling effect, which largely reduces the need to refresh screen while browsing the web. You could have a try on it.
  • Web Browser for E-Ink devices | 2021-02-21

What are some alternatives?

When comparing stylus and browser you can also consider the following projects:

Hendroid - Doujinshi Android App

darkreader - Dark Reader Chrome and Firefox extension

baresip-studio - baresip library based SIP client for Android

nextcloud-deck - 📋 Android client for nextcloud deck app

QuickWeather - Weather at a glance! Current and forecast weather for anywhere in the world!

Simple-Dialer - A handy phone call manager with phonebook, number blocking and multi-SIM support

Simple-Calendar - A simple calendar with events, customizable widgets and no ads.

markor - Text editor - Notes & ToDo (for Android) - Markdown, todo.txt, plaintext, math, ..