luminance-rs VS rust-graphics-crates

gives me same vibes as https://github.com/phaazon/luminance-rs

Potentially it is due to this layout optimization and a missing repr(C) somewhere in your code or a dependency. For example, here is an is a related issue in luminance.

luminance is a graphics ecosystem focusing on type-safe and type-level API. This is part of a blog article series describing the process of redesign the API to update it to how I see things today, trying to fix several flaws of the previous design, and bring more simplicity to developers.

The WebGL API might be what you are looking for if you are building a game. It supports textures, vertex buffers, and shaders. luminance-rs has a backend: https://github.com/phaazon/luminance-rs/tree/master/examples/web

There is no GUI framework used -- it is built on GLFW and Luminance. This is after using winit and wgpu for some time.

This list is really cool! I've had a lot of success with luminance - which is a mid-level graphics library (vertex buffers, shaders, etc). It has OpenGL and WebGL backends.

I made a list of graphics crates a while back: https://github.com/ocboogie/rust-graphics-crates

If you just want a simple framebuffer, there's a simple section that has what you need. However if minifb is working for you, then it works for you. The reason minifb isn't on the list is because I tried to have the list be mostly rust-centric crates (e.g. isn't just a binding for a C/C++ lib). I made an exception for sdl2, because it is actively maintained and is more than just a binding.