reanimate VS manim

Reanimate sounds almost ideal, with its support for LaTeX. But unfortunately, it is all rendered in batch, not providing for any interactivity.

Is this the discussion you're referring to? https://github.com/reanimate/reanimate/discussions/210

It's actually pretty interesting to read. The author makes a not totally unreasonable argument as for why it uses unsafePerformIO.

Now what I'm really curious about is why the very first example on the site I clicked into the source code for, a simple 59-line example, is using unsafePerformIO. That actually worries me more because it suggests that as a user I might have to use unsafePerformIO. https://github.com/reanimate/reanimate/blob/d4d3898831edb4aa...

Not really dashboard library, but reanimate is a good library for this kind of stuff.

Some other "applications" (if you're not interested in compilers) might be writing shell scripts: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/turtle Or animating stuff: https://github.com/reanimate/reanimate and https://hackage.haskell.org/package/gloss

That aside, it seems that svg-tree doesn’t support filter elements, so I recommend reanimate-svg. You can join the Discord server for Reanimate and ask for help. Good luck.

See also reanimate, a very similar Haskell library: https://reanimate.github.io/

This is very niche, but something I've wanted to do for a while is to generate some cool physics example on the surface of a sphere with https://hackage.haskell.org/package/hamilton, and display it with https://reanimate.github.io/ (using https://hackage.haskell.org/package/linear for the projection)

Hi u/Target_Organic, I wich you a warm welcome! Haskell is often very satisfying to work with, it has a sense of beauty in it. Regarding your questions: 1. I never had big problems about performance. However, I personally place more emphasis about correctness, simplicity and readability of my programs. Performance tuning comes after. 2. For graphic libraries, I know diagrams, Reanimate and Haskell-chart. Since you seems interested by mathematical approach to graphics, I think you will find happiness there. 3. I'm not sure about the AI field. Other, more practical languages such as Python seems to have taken the lead. What is sure for me, that Machine Learning/NN would be nicely describe in Haskell with solid foundations.

https://github.com/ManimCommunity/manim/issues/3362

The animation looks awesome! Looks like the author used matplotlib (as they mention in a comment on the website): https://github.com/vankessel/sandbox/blob/master/graph/inter...

In the past, I have used manim to make mathematical animations: https://www.manim.community/ Manim is more flexible but that comes with some overhead of complexity and learning. Example of some animations using manim:

- List of videos using manim: https://www.manim.community/awesome/

- A blog post I made: https://azeemba.com/posts/degenerate-matter.html

harfang-wasm is a fork of pygbag.

harfang-wasm: https://github.com/harfang3d/harfang-wasm

pygbag: https://github.com/pygame-web/pygbag

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38772400 :

> FWIU e.g. panda3d does not have a react or rxpy-like API, but probably does have a component tree model?

Is there a react-like api over panda3d, or are there only traditional events?

Manim has a useful API for teaching. Is there a good way to do panda3d with a manim-like interface? https://github.com/ManimCommunity/manim/issues/3362#issuecom...

Manim Community: The Manim community (https://www.manim.community/) is a vibrant group of developers, educators, and enthusiasts who share their knowledge and creations. Joining the community is a great way to learn from others and get inspiration for your own projects.

Also check out community edition: https://www.manim.community

manim – A community-maintained Python framework for creating mathematical animations