pyxsi VS rohd

These three environments are glued together using pyxsi, which embeds Xilinx's simulator kernel (xsim). The result is a complicated monolith, but avoids the following "Bad Practices for Complex Dataflow":

Adam mentions it in his Aduvio post, but pyxsi shows how to stack Python on C/C++ on Vivado. (Disclaimer: mine.)

The sketch here is a little stale but shows the general idea.

I'm trying to understand if we can use the Vivado XSI to make our verification tasks easier and improve our coverage via a more productive language like C++ or python. I found an interesting project (https://github.com/gsmecher/pyxsi) that uses it but I'm still unsure if this is worth investing time on (given how many issues Xilinx tools usually have).

There's a similar project at Intel: https://github.com/intel/rohd

It uses Dart instead of Scala.

I've felt frustrated about SV and front end development for hardware and have been developing ROHD (https://github.com/intel/rohd) and it's been a worthwhile endeavor

Dart is a general purpose language, there even is a hardware development framework by Intel which is made in Dart

Check out ROHD: https://github.com/intel/rohd

You might be interested in checking out ROHD as well: https://github.com/intel/rohd