clumsy-graphics VS reanimate

for those interested in a typescript / react alternative checkout https://github.com/clumsycomputer/clumsy-graphics

here is a little library of fun math functions and types that have been slowly iterated on in one form or another during my free time for the past decade

the stuff on rhythm is the most fleshed out and should be documented enough for others to dive into

theres also some rough utilities for playing with prime numbers which can be helpful when composing rhythms

the next step for this library is to implement functions and types dealing with the concept of a loop which is a generalization of a circle, ellipse, and egg plus additional features!! this abstraction is what im most excited about right now but the current implementation is rather slow for professional use when dealing with audio/signals

the majority of the code presented here was developed in the context of me playing with simple 2d graphics and animations and thus may hinder more serious use from others. nonetheless i felt like it was time to share

if you want to play around with the code yourself i recommend using a tool that ive been developing that enables rapidly developing animations where frames are described using svg elements ⓐ la react

https://github.com/clumsycomputer/clumsy-graphics

Reanimate sounds almost ideal, with its support for LaTeX. But unfortunately, it is all rendered in batch, not providing for any interactivity.

Is this the discussion you're referring to? https://github.com/reanimate/reanimate/discussions/210

It's actually pretty interesting to read. The author makes a not totally unreasonable argument as for why it uses unsafePerformIO.

Now what I'm really curious about is why the very first example on the site I clicked into the source code for, a simple 59-line example, is using unsafePerformIO. That actually worries me more because it suggests that as a user I might have to use unsafePerformIO. https://github.com/reanimate/reanimate/blob/d4d3898831edb4aa...

Not really dashboard library, but reanimate is a good library for this kind of stuff.

Some other "applications" (if you're not interested in compilers) might be writing shell scripts: https://hackage.haskell.org/package/turtle Or animating stuff: https://github.com/reanimate/reanimate and https://hackage.haskell.org/package/gloss

That aside, it seems that svg-tree doesn’t support filter elements, so I recommend reanimate-svg. You can join the Discord server for Reanimate and ask for help. Good luck.

See also reanimate, a very similar Haskell library: https://reanimate.github.io/

This is very niche, but something I've wanted to do for a while is to generate some cool physics example on the surface of a sphere with https://hackage.haskell.org/package/hamilton, and display it with https://reanimate.github.io/ (using https://hackage.haskell.org/package/linear for the projection)

Hi u/Target_Organic, I wich you a warm welcome! Haskell is often very satisfying to work with, it has a sense of beauty in it. Regarding your questions: 1. I never had big problems about performance. However, I personally place more emphasis about correctness, simplicity and readability of my programs. Performance tuning comes after. 2. For graphic libraries, I know diagrams, Reanimate and Haskell-chart. Since you seems interested by mathematical approach to graphics, I think you will find happiness there. 3. I'm not sure about the AI field. Other, more practical languages such as Python seems to have taken the lead. What is sure for me, that Machine Learning/NN would be nicely describe in Haskell with solid foundations.