alienware-wmi VS Fyrox

Windows “Command Prompt” application is a terminal as well, “Command Line” is a generic term for a type of application that is run in a terminal. There is also a lib behind this that can be used in GUI applications if wanted. You are right that this does not currently work in Windows as I don’t know the path to the WMI interface on Windows as I wiped Windows many years ago and put Ubuntu on to speed it up. Having said that it would be really simple for anyone running Windows to add support to this application as it is written in Rust, happy to take PRs at https://github.com/a1ecbr0wn/alienware-wmi

Some other Rust game engines ship with their own physics engine. Fyrox, for example, has advanced 2D/3D physics, supporting rigid bodies, joints, ray casting and more. Godot too, which has community-led Rust bindings also has an in-built physics engine as well as a Godot-native extension using the Jolt physics engine. In fact, which is reported to be more performant than the official physics engine.

checkout https://fyrox.rs

I would say Bevy isn't really similar to Unity. Something like Fyrox - https://fyrox.rs/ - would be more similar. Bevy is more low level and lacks an editor (as of now, it's planned)

Fyrox might be an option, but for what you're looking (simple game logic, low performance concerns, desire for complete editor) for I'd probably choose Godot over it.

Besides Bevy there’s also Fyrox Engine that looks very promising. https://fyrox.rs/

We have our own engine. There aren't really full engines available in the Rust ecosystem. Bevy attempts to fill this, but it's far from being feature complete. There's also https://fyrox.rs/, but that's also work in progress. There's also https://rend3.rs/ which is just a 3d renderer, so you'll need to build the rest of the engine yourself.