three-d VS Fyrox

If you look closely at the second image, it has some weird triangle artifacts with the lighting. The first one i rendered in blender, the second one i used this rust 3d rendering library. Any help would be appreciated, this is my first time working with 3d rendering.

I just implemented a gltf headless renderer using https://github.com/asny/three-d, it's simple and clear.

I've made a simple multi-threaded heightmap generator using egui and three_d. Both have been really easy to use despite a few limitations.

Theirs also https://github.com/asny/three-d or https://github.com/not-fl3/miniquad. Or lower level ones like WGPU or GLOW.

I think that three-d fits your requirements, you should check it!

Some other Rust game engines ship with their own physics engine. Fyrox, for example, has advanced 2D/3D physics, supporting rigid bodies, joints, ray casting and more. Godot too, which has community-led Rust bindings also has an in-built physics engine as well as a Godot-native extension using the Jolt physics engine. In fact, which is reported to be more performant than the official physics engine.

checkout https://fyrox.rs

I would say Bevy isn't really similar to Unity. Something like Fyrox - https://fyrox.rs/ - would be more similar. Bevy is more low level and lacks an editor (as of now, it's planned)

Fyrox might be an option, but for what you're looking (simple game logic, low performance concerns, desire for complete editor) for I'd probably choose Godot over it.

Besides Bevy there’s also Fyrox Engine that looks very promising. https://fyrox.rs/

We have our own engine. There aren't really full engines available in the Rust ecosystem. Bevy attempts to fill this, but it's far from being feature complete. There's also https://fyrox.rs/, but that's also work in progress. There's also https://rend3.rs/ which is just a 3d renderer, so you'll need to build the rest of the engine yourself.