quinn
PeerTube
Our great sponsors
quinn | PeerTube | |
---|---|---|
23 | 409 | |
3,459 | 12,555 | |
3.0% | - | |
9.4 | 9.9 | |
about 20 hours ago | 8 days ago | |
Rust | TypeScript | |
Apache License 2.0 | GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
quinn
-
Why HTTP/3 is eating the world
Since it lives on top of UDP, I believe all you need is SOCK_DGRAM, right? The rest of QUIC can be in a userspace library ergonomically designed for your programming language e.g. https://github.com/quinn-rs/quinn - and can interoperate with others who have made different choices.
Alternately, if you need even higher performance, DPDK gives the abstractions you'd need; see e.g. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3565477.3569154 on performance characteristics.
-
Async rust – are we doing it all wrong?
> Making things thread safe for runtime-agnostic utilities like WebSocket is yet another price we pay for making everything multi-threaded by default. The standard way of doing what I'm doing in my code above would be to spawn one of the loops on a separate background task, which could land on a separate thread, meaning we must do all that synchronization to manage reading and writing to a socket from different threads for no good reason.
Why so? Libraries like quinn[1] define "no IO" crate to define runtime-agnostic protocol implementation. In this way we won't suffer by forcing ourselves using synchronization primitives.
Also, IMO it's relatively easy to use Send-bounded future in non-Send(i.o.w. single-threaded) runtime environment, but it's almost impossible to do opposite. Ecosystem users can freely use single threaded async runtime, but ecosystem providers should not. If you want every users to only use single threaded runtime, it's a major loss for the Rust ecosystem.
Typechecked Send/Sync bounds are one of the holy grails that Rust provides. Albeit it's overkill to use multithreaded async runtimes for most users, we should not abandon them because it opens an opportunity for high-end users who might seek Rust for their high-performance backends.
[1]: https://github.com/quinn-rs/quinn
-
quicssh-rs Rust implementation SSH over Quic proxy tool
quicssh-rs is quicssh rust implementation. It is based on quinn and tokio
-
The birth of a package manager [written in Rust :)]
Regarding Quinn, I had a blast this week resurrecting an old PR. Looking forward to the next!
- Best performing quic implementation?
-
str0m a sans I/O WebRTC library
By studying u/djcu/hachyderm.io (and others!) excellent work in Quinn, doing a sans I/O implementation of QUIC https://github.com/quinn-rs/quinn we have a way forward.
-
durian - a high-level general purpose client/server networking library
QUIC isn't web/wasm-compatible because of https://github.com/quinn-rs/quinn/issues/1388, so durian wouldn't either since it's built on top of it.
-
FPS server with QUINN?
Quinn, as in the implementation of QUIC? https://github.com/quinn-rs/quinn
-
I built a Zoom clone 100% IN RUST
You are right, I am planning to switch the transport to UDP + quic using the awesome QUINN library, https://github.com/quinn-rs/quinn .
-
I write a secure UDP tunnel
Hi, I am new to the community, I just started learning rust and created a secure UDP tunnel based on the Quinn library, thanks to Quinn, I didn't need to go into the detail of the QUIC protocol and quickly created a UDP tunnel, and thanks to the BBR congestion control algorithm it uses, the tunnel performs quite well with lousy and long fat network, I didn't do any benchmark, but it performs a lot better (higher throughput with LFN) than most of other TCP tunnel implementations I used before.
PeerTube
- YouTube's search function is atrocious now [video]
-
Mobile App, redesign, new dev, promotion build a bright future for PeerTube
PeerTube is a decentralized and federated alternative to YouTube. The goal of PeerTube is not to replace YouTube but to offer a viable alternative using the strength of ActivityPub and P2P protocols.
Being built on ActivityPub means PeerTube is able to be part of a bigger social network, the Fediverse (the Federated Universe). On the other hand, P2P technologies help PeerTube to solve the issue of money, inbound with all streaming platform : With PeerTube, you don't need to have a lot of bandwidth available on your server to host a PeerTube platform because all users (which didn't disable the feature) watching a video on PeerTube will be able to share this same video to other viewers.
If you are curious about PeerTube, I can't recommend you enough to check the official website (https://joinpeertube.org) to learn more about the project. If after that you want to try to use PeerTube as a content creator, you can try to find a platform available there to register or host yourself your own PeerTube platform on your own server.
The development of PeerTube is actually sponsored by Framasoft (https://framasoft.org), a french non-for-profit popular educational organization, a group of friends convinced that an emancipating digital world is possible, convinced that it will arise through actual actions on real world and online with and for you!
Framasoft is also involved in the development of Mobilizon, a decentralized and federated alternative to Facebook Events and Meetup.
If you want to contribute to PeerTube, feel free to:
* report bugs and give your feedback on Github or on our forums (https://github.com/Chocobozzz/PeerTube/)
- Peertube is a YouTube alternative anyone can join or run their own instance of as part of the Fediverse
-
Youtube ad block on pc (ublock origin)
If you're looking for YouTube alternatives, you might be interested in PeerTube. PeerTube is to YouTube what Mastodon is to Twitter. (Plus PeerTube and Mastodon use the same federation technology. You can follow PeerTube accounts from inside Mastodon and vice versa.)
-
My video streaming wishlist for the next 3 to 5 years
Hey! Just a rando here, but I would be interested in hearing your opinion as to where Peertube does well with this wish list and where it needs improvement.
https://joinpeertube.org
https://framablog.org/2023/11/28/peertube-v6-is-out-and-powe...
-
PeerTube v6 is out, and powered by your ideas !
If you are curious about PeerTube, I can't recommend you enough to check the official website to learn more about the project. If after that you want to try to use PeerTube as a content creator, you can try to find a platform available there to register or host yourself your own PeerTube platform on your own server.
-
PeerTube v6 is out, and powered by your ideas
> YouTube (and other mainstream providers) solves user stories. The user story is "I want to find and watch interesting videos" and they nail it.
You miss another user story: IT department wants to self host a video distributing platform on their intranet and users need to embed video in intranet CMS (blogs, wikis, etc.) and they will watch those videos at home, at the office and in between places.
Thinking audience and monetization, basically it's thinking "youtube clone", and that narrows outlooks on what peertube brings to the table.
> The user story for this, judging by their homepage (https://joinpeertube.org), seems to be "I want a boring lecture on how bad Big Tech is"?
What is PeerTube?
-
NewPipe – The lightweight YouTube experience for Android
Exactly what you described exists and is called PeerTube.
https://joinpeertube.org
https://github.com/Chocobozzz/PeerTube
-
YouTube's Anti-Adblock and uBlock Origin
> Why don't you or someone else try starting one?
https://joinpeertube.org/
There are several instances, but that is not the solution to what the parent comment is pointing out. Videos are being published on YouTube because of network effect; it has become the defacto platform.
-
Piped – An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube front end
There already is an alternative to youtube. Peertube https://joinpeertube.org/
The problem is most content creators are only publishing on YouTube, so that is where you have to go. If you are a content creator please publish on peertube so we have options. If you know a creator, likewise encourage them to publish there.
What are some alternatives?
quiche - 🥧 Savoury implementation of the QUIC transport protocol and HTTP/3
owncast - Take control over your live stream video by running it yourself. Streaming + chat out of the box.
s2n-quic - An implementation of the IETF QUIC protocol
reverse-proxy-confs - These confs are pulled into our SWAG image: https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-swag
h3
FreeTube - An Open Source YouTube app for privacy
msquic - Cross-platform, C implementation of the IETF QUIC protocol, exposed to C, C++, C# and Rust.
jellyfin-webos - WebOS Client for Jellyfin
laminar - A simple semi-reliable UDP protocol for multiplayer games
Piped - An alternative privacy-friendly YouTube frontend which is efficient by design.
neqo - Neqo, an implementation of QUIC in Rust
mediacms - MediaCMS is a modern, fully featured open source video and media CMS, written in Python/Django and React, featuring a REST API.