Ray VS rl-baselines3-zoo

22. Ray | Github | tutorial

Training times for GSM8k are mentioned here: https://github.com/ray-project/ray/tree/master/doc/source/te...

Here's a reference from RLlib that points to docs and an example, and here's one from one of my projects that includes all my own implementations

RLlib

⦿ AWS Glue Data Quality - Automatic data quality rule recommendations based on your data AWS Glue for Ray - Data integration with Ray (ray.io), a popular new open-source compute framework that helps you scale Python workloads

https://ray.io (just dropping the link)

I've wondered whether it's easier to add data analyst stuff to Elixir that Python seems to have, or add features to Python that Erlang (and by extension Elixir) provides out of the box.

By what I can see, if you want multiprocessing on Python in an easier way (let's say running async), you have to use something like ray core[0], then if you want multiple machines you need redis(?). Elixir/Erlang supports this out of the box.

Explorer[1] is an interesting approach, where it uses Rust via Rustler (Elixir library to call Rust code) and uses Polars as its dataframe library. I think Rustler needs to be reworked for this usecase, as it can be slow to return data. I made initial improvements which drastically improves encoding (https://github.com/elixir-nx/explorer/pull/282 and https://github.com/elixir-nx/explorer/pull/286, tldr 20+ seconds down to 3).

[0] https://github.com/ray-project/ray

Adding these for anyone who had a similar question about Ray vs dask 1, 2, 3

I'm trying to solve MountainCar-v0 enviroment from gymnasium with the A2C algorithm and the agent doesn't find a solution. I checked this so I added import stable_baselines3.common.sb2_compat.rmsprop_tf_like as RMSpropTFLike. Also checked the rl-baselines3-zoo for the hyperparameter tuning. So my code is:

RL Zoo3 (training framework): https://github.com/DLR-RM/rl-baselines3-zoo

I'm still new to the domain but wanted to shared some experimental data I've gathered from massive amount of experimentation. I don't have a strong understanding of the theory as I'm more of a software engineer than data scientist, but perhaps this will help other implementers. These notes are based on Stable Baselines 3 and RL Baselines3 Zoo with using PPO+LSTM (should apply generally to all the algos for the most part)

Try hyperparameter search. It's implemented here: https://github.com/DLR-RM/rl-baselines3-zoo for stable-baselines3. Hyperparameters make a huge difference in RL, much more than in supervised learning.

Integrating RL-baselines3-zoo

Hello, I've been running some tests of Double DQN with Stable Baselines 3 Zoo and to compare I'm using the graphs provided by Noisy Networks For Exploration.

- you can find tuned hyperparameters for DDPG, SAC, PPO in https://github.com/DLR-RM/rl-baselines3-zoo

For more complete implementation: https://github.com/DLR-RM/rl-baselines3-zoo

https://github.com/DLR-RM/rl-baselines3-zoo (PyTorch based, using https://github.com/DLR-RM/stable-baselines3)

We also release 100+ trained models in our experimental framework, the rl zoo: https://github.com/DLR-RM/rl-baselines3-zoo