letlang
Nim
letlang | Nim | |
---|---|---|
12 | 348 | |
157 | 16,158 | |
- | 0.4% | |
7.9 | 9.9 | |
4 months ago | about 6 hours ago | |
Rust | Nim | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
letlang
-
Letlang — Roadblocks and how to overcome them - My programming language targeting Rust
That works for any types (except the functional types), and even the generic ones. During code generation, I create structs that implement the Type trait.
-
A new milestone for Letlang (targeting Rust) - Effect Handlers
As stated on the website ( https://letlang.dev ), Letlang is a general-purpose language.
-
Writing a simple Lisp interpreter in Rust
Author here, the article is more about how Rust and its ecosystem are nice tools for language designers rather than the beauty of Lisp.
The crates listed in that article are the ones I use for my compiler: https://letlang.dev
Lisp was only chosen as a way to demonstrate the power of those crates and Rust features. A kind of way of justifying my choices for Letlang.
It's not "you should do it like this" but "you can do it like this".
-
Ask HN: Possible? Faster than C, simpler than Python, safer than Rust
"Faster than C", I saw people write C code slower than a Python equivalent. So I have to admit, I don't know what it means for a language to be fast, because it depends on the algorithm being implemented.
---
"simpler than Python", what does "simple" mean?
Simple design? Python's design is very complex (take a look at "Crimes with Python's pattern matching" < https://www.hillelwayne.com/post/python-abc/ > for example), on the other hand, assembly languages, or Lisp, or Forth, have a very simple design.
Simple as in "easy to use"? Rust is easy, write code, fix what the compiler tells you you did wrong. Joke aside, Go is quite easy to use and while I personally don't like this language, I get why it replaced Python in a lot of use cases.
Also, once you get used to the OTP framework, Erlang/Elixir/Gleam/any beam language are quite easy to use and have less footguns than Python.
---
"safer than Rust" is too vague. Is it memory safety? type safety? thread safety? cosmic ray safety? A mix of all of that?
Let's guess you meant "memory safety". All languages with a Garbage Collector are "memory safe".
---
On a semi-unrelated note, I've been working on https://letlang.dev
It's a language inspired by Erlang/Elixir (same concurrency model) that compiles to Rust code (the runtime use tokio). It is immutable, have no Garbage Collector thanks to Rust semantics, and dynamically typed.
I haven't run any benchmark (it's not even finished, I've been working on the specification before continuing the implementation), but I guess it could be slower than a rock.
---
For some recommendations, have you looked at Zig? Nim? Hare?
https://ziglang.org/
-
Syntax for defining algebraic data types
In my language (Letlang), I use the keyword class with structural pattern matching and optionally a predicate. Types (or rather, classes) can be combined with logical operators &, |, !:
-
Erlang's not about lightweight processes and message passing
Not sure this is what GP is talking about but to implement the actor model in https://letlang.dev I use tokio.
-
Features you've removed from your lang? Why did you put them in, why did you take them out?
In the early drafts of Letlang, I had the goal to add an equation solver. I got rid of that because:
-
What features would you want in a new programming language?
I'm working on a programming language inspired by erlang and which compiles to Rust: https://letlang.dev
-
Six programming languages I’d like to see
For a contract based language and a "really dynamically typed language", I'm working on https://letlang.dev
And it's because I haven't thought yet about how to do static type checking with such a feature.
I haven't got any time to work on it in the past few weeks, and I'm the only dev (would really love some help). So, it will be ready when it will be ready :P
-
Hello Letlang! My programming language targeting Rust
I use Rust generators to implement them, a rudimentary example: https://github.com/linkdd/letlang/blob/main/letlang_runtime/src/utils/entrypoint.rs
Nim
- The search for easier safe systems programming
- 3 years of fulltime Rust game development, and why we're leaving Rust behind
-
Top Paying Programming Technologies 2024
22. Nim - $80,000
-
"14 Years of Go" by Rob Pike
I think the right answer to your question would be NimLang[0]. In reality, if you're seeking to use this in any enterprise context, you'd most likely want to select the subset of C++ that makes sense for you or just use C#.
[0]https://nim-lang.org/
- Odin Programming Language
-
Ask HN: Interest in a Rust-Inspired Language Compiling to JavaScript?
I don't think it's a rust-inspired language, but since it has strong typing and compiles to javascript, did you give a look at nim [0] ?
For what it takes, I find the language very expressive without the verbosity in rust that reminds me java. And it is also very flexible.
[0] : https://nim-lang.org/
-
The nim website and the downloads are insecure
I see a valid cert for https://nim-lang.org/
-
Nim
FYI, on the front page, https://nim-lang.org, in large type you have this:
> Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. It combines successful concepts from mature languages like Python, Ada and Modula.
-
Things I've learned about building CLI tools in Python
You better off with using a compiled language.
If you interested in a language that's compiled, fast, but as easy and pleasant as Python - I'd recommend you take a look at [Nim](https://nim-lang.org).
And to prove what Nim's capable of - here's a cool repo with 100+ cli apps someone wrote in Nim: [c-blake/bu](https://github.com/c-blake/bu)
-
Mojo is now available on Mac
Chapel has at least several full-time developers at Cray/HPE and (I think) the US national labs, and has had some for almost two decades. That's much more than $100k.
Chapel is also just one of many other projects broadly interested in developing new programming languages for "high performance" programming. Out of that large field, Chapel is not especially related to the specific ideas or design goals of Mojo. Much more related are things like Codon (https://exaloop.io), and the metaprogramming models in Terra (https://terralang.org), Nim (https://nim-lang.org), and Zig (https://ziglang.org).
But Chapel is great! It has a lot of good ideas, especially for distributed-memory programming, which is its historical focus. It is more related to Legion (https://legion.stanford.edu, https://regent-lang.org), parallel & distributed Fortran, ZPL, etc.
What are some alternatives?
zigself - An implementation of the Self programming language in Zig
zig - General-purpose programming language and toolchain for maintaining robust, optimal, and reusable software.
scenebuilder - Scene Builder is a visual, drag 'n' drop, layout tool for designing JavaFX application user interfaces.
go - The Go programming language
cells - A Common Lisp implementation of the dataflow programming paradigm
Odin - Odin Programming Language
power-fx-host-samples - Samples for hosting Power Fx engine.
rust - Empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.
impulse - Impossible Dev Tools for React and Tailwind
crystal - The Crystal Programming Language
halo - An experimental graph-based meta programming language
v - Simple, fast, safe, compiled language for developing maintainable software. Compiles itself in <1s with zero library dependencies. Supports automatic C => V translation. https://vlang.io