eCAL VS rotor

New version (5.94) of the high performance interprocess / interhost communication framework eCAL is available. eCAL supports different transport layer like shared memory for interprocess and udp multicast for interhost communication. It does not force the user to use a specific serialization format but supports some of the standards like google protobuf, capnproto or flatbuffers. The API is wrapped to C, C++, Python, C#, Rust and Go (the last two I never tested ;-)). Here you can find all the documentation. Check out the great applications for monitoring, record and replay. eCAL is Apache 2 licensed, repository hosted here. Have fun :-)

I you just need a fast publish / subscribe framework for windows you can give eCAL a try. The setup is done in less a minute and their is no dependency hell. Just to mention it as alternative. Documentation here

I would concider using eCAL since it blasts everything out of the water in terms of performance and comes with some handy tooling for inspection of messages in-travel.

Source on GitHub: https://github.com/continental/ecal

Check out eCal.

This really makes me want to try https://github.com/continental/ecal with https://github.com/google/flatbuffers to see how they compare. I also know that gpc for cpp at least stops functioning by about 4 MB of request size. Which I find stupid. What if I want to send uncompressed bitmaps!

Congratulations. Well done. eCAL will update as soon as possible to the new release. The new custom header and the n:m pub/sub support are really welcome new features.

Here is their counter callback example: https://github.com/continental/ecal/blob/master/samples/cpp/counter/counter_rec_cb/src/counter_rec_cb.cpp

If your architecture fits into inter-process messaging, i.e. spawn threads which do similar or different tasks and inform each other via messages, try to use actor framework, i.e. rotor (disclaimer: I'm the author). If there is a need to expand messaging even more, i.e. across the network, you can try to use caf, which provides that facility out of the box.

What you achieved, is handlers decoupling, i.e. when one handler knows nothing about other handler, which leads to good application testability. However, with standard promise/future bases messaging, if performance matters (and it usually does, otherwise why use C++?), i doubt that your implementation overwhelms the performance of specialized actor libraries, like sobjectizer ("batteries included" actors toolbox) or rotor (DIY-like actor constructor set; disclaimer: I'm the author of it).

I have been reading the documents from Boost.fibre and Boost.Signals2 which I could use, maybe ASIO for async. I also checked ZeroMQ (this seems to be more or less "only" for networking), Copper and Rotor. If this were just a simple MCU project I would just take the FreeRTOS and would have everything I need. Now I'm just lost how to structure my code / how to realize my main loop.

I would like to present my project rotor, which is event loop friendly C++ actor micro framework with Erlang-like microframework with supervising capabilities.

rotor actor library (I'm the author) was designed to solve similar problem, which I named "actor intrusiveness", when almost every piece of code should be written in form of actor, and, the working threads, which spin actors, are out of your control.

PS. I'm the author of rotor framework )

May be actor frameworks like caf, sobjectizer or rotor is something, that you are looking for.