a32nx VS uniffi-rs

Get the FlyByWire A32NX.

I know that there is a changelog on Github here: https://github.com/flybywiresim/a32nx/blob/master/.github/CHANGELOG.md

This shows what is planned for 0.8

FlyByWire A320 (site) note: adds new plane, does not replace vanilla

Next time it will warn you earlier (at least after this is QA tested and merged) ;) https://github.com/flybywiresim/a32nx/pull/6650

The ecam warning for packs off is not in at the moment. An entirely new flight warning system is being built from scratch. Once that’s ready all of the ECAM warnings will be implemented. The packs off one might be a good idea to do in the interim even with the old system as I’ve seen this quite a few times and even done it myself…

Just found this today. Thought it was pretty interesting that Rust is being used to build an A320 for Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020.

Is there a connection with Mozilla UniFFI ?

Rust <> Swift/ Kotlin works very well with uniffi-rs by Mozilla: https://github.com/mozilla/uniffi-rs

Check out: https://github.com/mozilla/uniffi-rs

Did a brief search on the rust ffi, seems that mozilla has something interesting shared on the topic https://github.com/mozilla/uniffi-rs and https://blog.mozilla.org/data/2022/01/31/this-week-in-glean-...

I am trying to build Realm alternative using Rust - Juno. I have the barebone UniFFI integration into a Swift package where I can send structs from Rust to Swift. But what I want to achieve is have a Swift struct/class implementing a protocol/subclass be able to stored using a KV store in rust.

I think they should give up on Flutter for Web and just focus on mobile and desktop (and maybe extend use on Smart Watches, Smart TV, embedded instead). Too many people still remember Java Applets, google's GWT, Flash/Flex and how it ended. They are out of focus trying to support Web as well.

I had also higher expectation regarding Dart FFI - I think with their ffigen we are still only in ctypes like python bindings territory. Nowhere near something like pybind11 [0] for c++ bindings yet.

[0] https://github.com/pybind/pybind11

[1] https://github.com/mozilla/uniffi-rs

https://github.com/mozilla/uniffi-rs - a multi-language bindings generator for rust

Then again it seems it's targeting bindings to managed languages where people are used to "no UB on cross-thread sharing", possibly even at the cost of overhead. I don't like that culture (and prefer Rust's zero-overhead verification or C++'s "trust the programmer"), but I guess I'm not the target audience and there are some people who would appreciate it. And sadly programmers who haven't learned Rust or otherwise "properly" learned threading seem to get it wrong.