LatencyFleX VS Streamline

Installing LatencyFleX on multiple different games and Proton versions was cumbersome to me. I created an install script to do that for you. Tested on Arch Linux, should work on any distribution, provided LatencyFleX is installed on the system beforehand.

Find liblatencyflex_layer.so, latencyflex_layer.dll, latencyflex_wine.dll from extracted https://github.com/ishitatsuyuki/LatencyFleX files

No and it has a vendor agnostic alternative that works better: \ https://github.com/ishitatsuyuki/LatencyFleX

Strangely, a reflex alternative is available on Linux for AMD cards (third party, open) https://github.com/ishitatsuyuki/LatencyFleX Nvidia and AMD could both implement that as a standard, but NVidia is not keen on standards, and AMD is oblivious.

If you're on linux there's LatencyFleX: https://github.com/ishitatsuyuki/LatencyFleX

https://github.com/ishitatsuyuki/LatencyFleX here you go

And this depends on what actually reflex is and doing - Nvidia love to take a standard api and giving it a brand name and strut around like they invented something new. For example, https://github.com/ishitatsuyuki/LatencyFleX seems to suggest they get similar advantages "just" using the submission timing interfaces already available in the standard graphics APIs, I wouldn't be surprised if reflex is "just" an implementation of that, possibly with an API designed to be a bit easier to integrate in game engines than the gamedev doing it themselves.

As long as you have the most recent driver version and are on Proton Experimental, you shouldn't really have to do anything. You are on a VERY old Proton-GE build, which does not include DXVK 2.0, so that's probably why you're having issues. Maybe look into LatencyFlex, but again, with these bans going around, use at your own risk.

Use LatencyFlex instead. However it might be a bit tricky to get it working. I've not yet had success using it in Overwatch 2.

More or less, but nvidia created an open-source initiative to literally make it a "single click" process to add the latest FSR, DLSS, and XeSS all to a game at once: https://github.com/NVIDIAGameWorks/Streamline

The repository on Github does not contain XeSS either. It needs to be manually added as form of a plugin. But Intel does not seem to be interested in developing one currently at all (see here and here). So I wouldn't call that a proper solution and I wouldn't even say Intel is any closer to working together than AMD...

Streamline is open source and you can find it here on the github... https://github.com/NVIDIAGameWorks/Streamline

no lol. it's really that easy. There are generic wrappers over it like https://github.com/NVIDIAGameWorks/Streamline

Yes if only there were some open source project that developers could implement that abstracted away the implementation of upscaling/framegen so that the vendors of such technology could just write plugins for it and developers wouldn't have to worry about directly supporting specific technologies. ...oh wait

It's there on Github, under MIT license. The Framework itself is not just a way to implement DLSS in any game, but it would allow for any vendor, Intel and AMD too, to have their own upscalers that just hook into this and work, not requiring any extra work from the developers. While AMD is paying for Respawn Entertainment to not download a UE4 plugin from the content store, Nvidia has created a framework that would allow FSR 2 to be in more games, if AMD bothered to support it...

...what hypothetical scenario is that? what the hell are you even talking about? The article in OP has a nvidia rep who very bluntly says they will not do that and they already have an open source temporal plugin system called streamline while AMD ignores the question.

Granted, if you’re not a bot, I don’t at all mind the message being shared. It’s time for people to adjust to the current information we’ve learned since March this year now with the Boundary dev team that AMD is unquestionably not the good guy quirky underdog people have loved to imagine them as. In fact with this combined with the recent changes to opening the source to more and more projects as well as developing streamline, an open source tool for properly implementing every brand’s scalar including frame gen into gaming projects, I’d say the only real thing left to complain about is the price, which I get can be absolutely staggering for anyone other than an adult with disposable income in a developed country.

Do you know Streamline SDK already exists, right? Let me quote it for you from Github: Streamline is an open-sourced cross-IHV solution that simplifies integration of the latest NVIDIA and other independent hardware vendors’ super resolution technologies into applications and games. This framework allows developers to easily implement one single integration and enable multiple super-resolution technologies and other graphics effects supported by the hardware vendor.