Threeify Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to threeify
-
-
BezierCurveDemo1997
Utah Teapot and Mystify Screensaver, 16-Bit DOS, Personal Project 1997 https://files.scene.org/view/mirrors/hornet/code/tutors/math/azr_bcrv.zip
-
Appwrite
Appwrite - The open-source backend cloud platform. Add Auth, Databases, Functions, and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale while using your preferred coding languages and tools.
-
-
modern-cpp-features
A cheatsheet of modern C++ language and library features.
-
-
yg-vishva
yg-vishva is a web component for 3D world/universe. [Note: As this project was outcome of extraction of my portfolio code and still THINKING what all things to ADD, so focused on things than the code...post that code will get refactor!]
-
-
Onboard AI
Learn any GitHub repo in 59 seconds. Onboard AI learns any GitHub repo in minutes and lets you chat with it to locate functionality, understand different parts, and generate new code. Use it for free at www.getonboard.dev.
-
-
-
-
-
behave-graph
Open, extensible, small and simple behaviour-graph execution engine. Discord here: https://discord.gg/mrags8WyuH
threeify reviews and mentions
-
C++23: The Next C++ Standard
As someone who has written math libraries over and over again for the last 25 years (no joke - wrote this in 1997: https://github.com/bhouston/BezierCurveDemo1997/blob/master/... and just recently wrote the Threeify math library: https://github.com/bhouston/threeify/tree/master/packages/ma...), I find that operator overloading works only for the simple cases but that for performance and clarify, function names work best.
Function names let you clarify that it is an outside product or inside product (e.g. there are often different types of adds, multiplies, divides), and I can not stand when someone maps cross product onto ^ or dot product onto something else. Also operator overloading often doesn't make clear memory management, rather it replies on making new objects constantly, where as with function names, you can pass in a parameter that will take the result. Lastly, function names allow you to pass in how to handle various conditions, like non-invertible, NANs, etc.
I find word based function more verbose but significant less error prone and also they are more performant. Operator overloading is only good for very simple code and even then people always push it too far so that I can not understand it.
-
Clara.io Shutting Down
Fun fact, a lot of it is open source, just not where you would expect it. During the creation of Clara.io I created over 200 PRs to Three.js:
https://github.com/mrdoob/three.js/pulls?q=is%3Apr+author%3A...
The problem with open sourcing it wholesale at this point is a challenge because parts of the tech stack became parts of Threekit.com. Threekit.com is VC funded and an ongoing business operation.
I do what I can with open source still, see:
Stats
bhouston/threeify is an open source project licensed under GNU General Public License v3.0 or later which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of threeify is TypeScript.
