toolbox-desktop-integration VS stable-baselines3

Combine with toolbox-desktop-integration and you should have your cake and be able to eat it, too.

The latest release (v3.0.0) of Upkie's software brings a functional sim-to-real reinforcement learning pipeline based on Stable Baselines3, with standard sim-to-real tricks. The pipeline trains on the Gymnasium environments distributed in upkie.envs (setup: pip install upkie) and is implemented in the PPO balancer. Here is a policy running on an Upkie:

PettingZoo 1.24.0 is now live! This release includes Python 3.11 support, updated Chess and Hanabi environment versions, and many bugfixes, documentation updates and testing expansions. We are also very excited to announce 3 tutorials using Stable-Baselines3, and a full training script using CleanRL with TensorBoard and WandB.

I am wondering why there is so few algorithms in Stable Baselines 3 (SB3, https://github.com/DLR-RM/stable-baselines3/tree/master)? I was expecting some algorithms like ICM, HIRO, DIAYN, ... Why there is no model-based, skill-chaining, hierarchical-RL, ... algorithms implemented there?

Discord is more focused, and they have a page for people who wants to contribute https://github.com/DLR-RM/stable-baselines3/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md

Therefore, I debugged this error to the ReplayBuffer that was imported from `SB3`. This is the problem function -

Have you ever wanted to use dm-control with stable-baselines3? Within Reinforcement learning (RL), a number of APIs are used to implement environments, with limited ability to convert between them. This makes training agents across different APIs highly difficult, and has resulted in a fractured ecosystem.

Changelog: https://github.com/DLR-RM/stable-baselines3/releases/tag/v1.8.0

Great project! One question though, is there any reason why you are not using existing RL models instead of creating your own, such as stable baselines?