taskwiki VS github-orgmode-tests

A bit more online sleuthing around Taskwiki's GitHub issues lead me to this post from March 2022 that (seemed) to resemble the issue I was having. A handful of users reported the error resolving after they fixed some underlying Python issues. Hoping this was my issue as well, I ran brew upgrade to update my MacOS' version of Python from 3.10.6_1 to 3.10.6_2. After that, I uninstalled and reinstalled tasklib, as well as unlinking and relinking my version of Python's symlinks.

My overall experience with the plugin so far has been positive. That said, I've been struggling to resolve a (small) ambiguity in the TaskWiki docs, hence this post.

with the https://github.com/tools-life/taskwiki plugin to bring taskwarrior into vimwiki

If you already use taskwarior, make sure to checkout taskwiki: https://github.com/tools-life/taskwiki (needs vimwiki)

I use taskwiki, I was already using vimwiki so it wasn’t a big leap, but it’s pretty invasive. I configure both it and vimwiki to turn off a lot of default maps, information hiding, etc.

And extend functionality/ease of use with Taskwiki + Taskwarrior-tui + Wyrd

I just started migrating to taskwarrior which great due to the many clients. Actually its integration with vimwiki via the taskwiki plugin [1] is quite powerfull allowing editable views. Wonder if this dag aproach could be integrated via metadata without loosing compatibility.

[1] https://github.com/tools-life/taskwiki

Oooo. this seems promising. Does it work with taskwarrior/taskwiki integration?

This won't solve your problem but I noticed this plugin https://github.com/tools-life/taskwiki#make-sure-you-satisfy-the-requirements says to use the vimwiki dev branch and looks like you aren't: https://github.com/byteofsoren/dotfiles/commit/8c74014bb8f78895dc65d6abdd08c686c1b9f2bc#diff-32c0eb324a51d12fd616720bdfdf2b40ee0bbf2e8a092f9180a85e562edfcd2cR116

Task warrior https://taskwarrior.org/ With task wiki https://github.com/tools-life/taskwiki And task warrior for android https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=kvj.taskw&hl=en_US&gl=US

- or to visualize and use it as a personal partner.

There's already a ton of open-source UIs such as Chatbot-ui[3] and Reor[4]. And that's just the tip of the iceberg.

Personally, I haven't been consistent enough through the years in note-taking.

So, I'm really curious to learn more about those of you who were and implemented such pipelines.

I'm sure there's a ton of really fascinating experiences.

[1] https://orgmode.org/

literate config (using ORG mode)

Obligatory reference to Emacs Org-Mode [1].

Author's approach is basically Org-Mode with fewer helpers.

Org-mode's power is that, at core, it's just a text file, with gradual augmentation.

Then again, Org-Mode is a tool you must install, accessible through a limited list of clients (Emacs obviously, but also VSCode), and the power of OP's approach is that it requires no external tools.

[1] https://orgmode.org

This reminds me a lot of [Org Mode](https://orgmode.org/). Do you have plans to add other org-like features, like evaluating code blocks? I don't personally see myself moving away from org-mode, but it would be nice to have something to recommend to people who are reluctant to use emacs, even if it's only for a single application.

If you want to spare a couple of detours, you probably could start with Emacs Org-mode according to Greenspun's eleventh rule: "Any sufficiently complicated PIM or note-taking program contains an ad hoc, informally specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of Org mode."

Wow, no one has recommended Org mode (https://orgmode.org). I started using Emacs nearly 20 years ago specifically because of Org. I use Org for all my static sites, note taking, to-do lists and calendar. Org has a lightweight markup language that has far more features than Markdown (e.g., plain text spreadsheets!), but the markup isn't visible to the extent that Markdown is in most editors. Emacs with Org files behaves almost like a WYSIWYG editor. For example, links in Org files are clickable and their URLs aren't visible unless a cursor is hovered over them. I'm an obsessive note-taker with more than 6,000 Org files in my personal knowledge base and none of the dozens of other note-taking apps that I've evaluated comes even close to Emacs with Org. But to be fair, I create content on Linux only so support for mobile devices doesn't matter to me.

By the way, I think it's hilarious that you mentioned Dreamweaver, dv35z, because I experimented with using Dreamweaver for note-taking in the 90s! I still have a few HTML files that include notes I took back then using Dreamweaver. Needless to say, I definitely prefer Emacs with Org!

Just another reason for one to get into org-mode[1] and org-roam[2].

Combine this with the concept of Zettelkasten[3] and you have a wonderful way to organize and store all your notes and writings, and even a way to know at what point you should move your idea from analog to digital (based on it's maturity, e.g. "evergreen state").

1. https://orgmode.org/