stevenarella VS rust

Client side: - https://github.com/Thinkofname/steven - https://github.com/iceiix/stevenarella - https://github.com/DarkZek/RustCraft

stevenarella perhaps? 🙂

I suppose you could mod Stevenarella, which is a libre Minecraft client written in Rust, but it's very incomplete.

Not paladin-levels of morality? https://github.com/iceiix/stevenarella/issues/562

iceiix, the dev of stevenarella, is not as active sadly and it can take quite a while for them to respond to issues and pull requests. There was also a disagreement on the direction of a part of the project. If you check some Github discussions there were some discussions about it and this fork was made to accelerate development and do some large changes (e.g. remove web support, making the application multithreaded, move to a modern renderer, etc).

I haven't tried this project personally, but https://github.com/iceiix/stevenarella seems to be what you are looking for. It is an interesting thought that perhaps it is possible to play minecraft with completely free software.

There's also stevenarella, an implementation of the Minecraft client in Rust. I found these two projects just googling to see if anyone had ever attempted to do reimplementations of these things, and Feather was the first result. I'm both surprised and not surprised by how little known these projects are, including other Minecraft reimplemtations. Since I didn't know, I thought maybe other people who didn't know might be interested.

Here's an example of someone citing a disagreement between CRT and shell32:

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44650

This in addition to the Rust CVE mentioned elsewhere in the thread which was rooted in this issue:

https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/04/09/cve-2024-24576.html

Here are some quick programs to test contrasting approaches. I don't have examples of inputs where they parse differently on hand right now, but I know they exist. This was also a problem that was frequently discussed internally when I worked at MSFT.

    #include 

> instead of choosing a certain numbered version of the random library (if I remember correctly) I let cargo download the latest version which had a completely different API.

Yeah, they didn't follow the instructions and got burned. I still think that multiple things went wrong simultaneously for that experience. I wonder if more prevalent uses of `#[doc(alias = "name")]` being leveraged by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120730 (which now that I check only accounts for methods and not functions, I should get on that!) so that when changing APIs around people at least get a slightly better experience.

Almost fixed the compiler: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123325

Rust: A secure, efficient, and modern programming language (omitting ten thousand words). You can simply follow the installation instructions provided on the official website.

Recently did something similar in Rust but for generating SVGs. We've adopted it for snapshot testing of cargo and rustc's output. Don't have a good PR handy for showing Github's rendering of changes in the SVG (text, side-by-side, swiping) but https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121877/files has newly added SVGs.

To see what is supported, see the screenshot in the docs: https://docs.rs/anstyle-svg/latest/anstyle_svg/

We strongly believe in Rust as a powerful language for building production-grade software, especially for systems like ours that run alongside Kubernetes.

The above Assert<{N % 2 == 1}> requires #![feature(generic_const_exprs)] and the nightly toolchain. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76560 for more info.