read VS Magic Enum C++

It was on the mailing list that screens proposals prior to writing papers. Basically it was for making input much easier to work with, like this: https://github.com/ShakaUVM/read

I have thought about submitting a library of mine (https://github.com/ShakaUVM/read) for standardization or inclusion in Boost. Basically it does for input what format did for output - replace the stream system with something more functional.

Using readlib:

That's why I wrote my read library (https://github.com/ShakaUVM/read). You can just do:

5) Make input come from functions rather than call by reference, such as what I did here: https://github.com/ShakaUVM/read

I'm not sure this is quite what you're asking for, but this library has been super helpful to me in the past : https://github.com/Neargye/magic_enum

Also, a shoutout to Magic Enum: https://github.com/Neargye/magic_enum

What does this have to offer over magic_enum?

But it's a hack, and I prefer not to use hacks in production, because of their significant limitations:

You can either write a to string(view) function for your enum or use https://github.com/Neargye/magic_enum

Why reinvent the wheel? magic_enum

Also if you want to convert enum members to string representation I suggest you just use magic_enum instead, much smaller dependency.

Magic Enum provides that.