proc-macro-workshop VS rust

Tangentially, the proc macro workshop walks through building a derive macro implementing a builder pattern. From experience, I can tell I couldn't ever write proc macros just by reading the manual, going through it is really helpful https://github.com/dtolnay/proc-macro-workshop/blob/master/README.md

I am working on the proc macro workshop and am a little stuck on the builder portion of the workshop. Step 08-unrecognized-attributes wants you to handle the car where the field modifier has a misspelled portion (eac instead of each)

I would very much second the suggestion to do David Tolnay’s Proc Macro Workshop if you want to start understanding how to write them. I’d been writing Rust for years but always kind of avoided proc macros.

When I had a need for them, I went through only the first section of the workshop and everything clicked. You can just do the derive macro section and all the strange and scary-looking macro syntax will make sense. I realized that there is only a bit of extra syntax but it’s used very often so it can seem a little overwhelming when reading macro code.

https://github.com/dtolnay/proc-macro-workshop

Another good one imo is the proc-macro-workshop.

Don't be afraid of proc macros and derive macros, they rule. Study the basic examples. Crates like darling and resources like David Tolnay's workshop will help. Write derives for your simpler traits and impress your colleagues.

Regarding 4, I think that macros are an interesting intermediate/advanced topic. I personally loved the material from https://github.com/dtolnay/proc-macro-workshop

It took me a while to get anything done. My mistake : I came accross the procedural macros workshop several times, and every time I dismissed it, thinking - meh I'll just hack together exactly what I need and move on. Then finally I figured there is no way around it. The builder exercise sounds boring but it covers the topic pretty well. And then I went on to the debug one and from there was able to build the proc macro I wanted.

Hey! While researching, I found this: https://github.com/dtolnay/proc-macro-workshop

Rust Latam: procedural macros workshop - David Tolnay

> There are online Rust compilers and interpreters already if you just want to rapid prototype and develop ideas in Rust

You are responding to one of the key developers of Rust early on[1], who's been working with the language for 14 years at that point.

[1] https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/graphs/contributors?from=2... and he's still #16 in commits overall today, despite almost no activity on the rust compiler since 2014.

If you haven't dipped your touch-typing fingers into Rust yet, you really owe it to yourself. Rust is a modern programming language with features that make it suitable not only for systems programming -- its original purpose, but just about any other environment, too; there are frameworks that let your build web services, web applications including user interfaces, software for embedded devices, machine learning solutions, and of course, command-line tools. Since a custom GitHub Action is essentially a command-line tool that interacts with the system through files and environment variables, Rust is perfectly suited for that as well.

Here's an example of someone citing a disagreement between CRT and shell32:

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44650

This in addition to the Rust CVE mentioned elsewhere in the thread which was rooted in this issue:

https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/04/09/cve-2024-24576.html

Here are some quick programs to test contrasting approaches. I don't have examples of inputs where they parse differently on hand right now, but I know they exist. This was also a problem that was frequently discussed internally when I worked at MSFT.

    #include 

> instead of choosing a certain numbered version of the random library (if I remember correctly) I let cargo download the latest version which had a completely different API.

Yeah, they didn't follow the instructions and got burned. I still think that multiple things went wrong simultaneously for that experience. I wonder if more prevalent uses of `#[doc(alias = "name")]` being leveraged by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120730 (which now that I check only accounts for methods and not functions, I should get on that!) so that when changing APIs around people at least get a slightly better experience.

Almost fixed the compiler: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123325

Rust: A secure, efficient, and modern programming language (omitting ten thousand words). You can simply follow the installation instructions provided on the official website.

Recently did something similar in Rust but for generating SVGs. We've adopted it for snapshot testing of cargo and rustc's output. Don't have a good PR handy for showing Github's rendering of changes in the SVG (text, side-by-side, swiping) but https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121877/files has newly added SVGs.

To see what is supported, see the screenshot in the docs: https://docs.rs/anstyle-svg/latest/anstyle_svg/

We strongly believe in Rust as a powerful language for building production-grade software, especially for systems like ours that run alongside Kubernetes.