p2p-webtransport VS FirebaseRTC

> I just wish WebRTC wasn't so prescriptive of DTLS/SRTP.

There was a webrtc-webtransport spec, but it got renamed to p2p-webtransport[1]. I'm not sure when the rename happened. Feels like a pretty strong indicator of webrtc being deconstructed, but whose to say this goes anywhere. We'd also need webcodecs.

It's somewhat scary & also somewhat exciting thinking of the one good, working, browser supported standard being ripped into pieces (p2p-webtransport, webcodecs, more) & being user-implemented. Having the browser & servers have a well-known target is both great but also perhaps confining. If we leave it up to each site/library to DIY their solution, figure out how to balance the p2p feeds, it'll be a long long time before the Rest of the World (other than the very big few) have reasonable tech again. WebRTC is quite capable & a nice even playing field, with lots of well-known rules to enable creative interopation. We'd be throwing away a lot. I'd hoped for webrtc-webtransport, to at least keep some order & regularity, but that seems out, at the moment. But Webrtc-nv is still ultra-formative; anything could happen.

The rest of the transport stack is also undergoing massive seismic shifts. I feel like we're in for a lot of years of running QUIC or HTTP3 over WebRTC Data-Channels and over WebTransport, so we can explore solutions the new capabilities while not having to ram each & every change through with the browser implementers. It feels like a less visible but far more massive Web Extensibility Manifesto moment, only at sub-HTML levels[2]. The browsers refused to let us play with HTTP Push, never let appdevs know realtime resources had been pushed at the browser, so we're still debating terrible WebSocket vs SSE choices; terrible. I think of gRPC-web & what an abomination that is, how sad & pointless that effort is; all because the browser is a mere glimmer of the underlying transport. I feel like a lot of experimentation & exploration is going to happen if we start exploring QUIC or HTTP3 over WebTransport. Attempts to reimagine alternatives to WebRTC are also possible if we had specs like p2p-webtransport, or just did QUIC over DataChannels. Running modern protocols in the client, not the browser, seems like a semi-cursed future, but necessary, at least for a while, while we don't yet know what we could do. The browsers are super laggy, slow to expose capabilities.

[1] https://github.com/w3c/p2p-webtransport

[2] https://github.com/extensibleweb/manifesto

WebRTC it is: https://webrtc.org/

Yes only the network layer encryption. No file encryption as it will cost client browsers a lot in case of encrypting and then decrypting that at other end.

I have written more about it here: https://dikshantraj2001.medium.com/nat-stun-turn-and-ice-466...

Currently, I am using the public STUN servers only. If the IPs are not reachable, it would show an error and won't work as setting up TURN server would mean same as a third party server saving in file and serving it over network

You might also consider assessing complementary or alternative technologies; WebSocket and HTTP aren’t the only options when it comes to real-time communication, after all. WebRTC is similar to WebSocket, with the key difference being that it’s used to implement peer-to-peer connections without relying on a server. That can be especially helpful for video calls, allowing participants to communicate directly without introducing load to your server.

We use WebRTC to gain access to a user’s camera and microphone using the getUserMedia method. Typically, I would gain access to both of these from the same call. However, our experience requires the camera to flip from facing the environment to facing the user and I noticed that the small period of time the flip occurred (and microphone wasn’t available) contributed to a bit of audio lagging in the final recorded video. This was one of the nastier bugs I faced in development. So, we’ll just access each of these on their own media streams so that the camera can flip independently from the microphone.

Low latency streaming (<500ms): The Video SDK's infrastructure is built with WebbRTC, which helps to deliver secure and ultra-low latency video streams to all audiences at different bandwidths.

Web Real-Time Communication (WebRTC) is a technology developed by Google in 2013 for peer-to-peer communication. WebRTC enables web browsers to capture audio, video, exchange data, and teleconferencing without plugins or intermediaries. WebRTC achieve these through APIs and protocols that interact with one another. WebRTC media streaming when used with SocKet.IO will produce an application that streams media and exchange data instantly. Socket.IO is a library that provides low latency bi-directional communication between client and server. Socket.IO was built on websocket, a communication protocol that provides a full-duplex and low latency communication between server and browser. In this article, readers will learn how to build a video chat application using WebRTC and Socket.IO. This article is for web developers who wish to develop web applications that can stream media between two peers of computers in real-time without installing any plugins.

Possibly you what to look into WebRTC: https://webrtc.org/

Use the language you're comfortable with. Sounds like you're interested in creating a blockchain game. Writing your own simple game engine isn't simple. I would recommend utilizing an existing one for whatever language you want. If you still choose to write your own it can be a valuable lesson in graphical programming which I personally find fun. It's easier to cheat a webpage embedded game written in Javascript than one ported to WebASM in my experience and I've heard good things about WebRTC for embedded multiplayer games.

Have you looked into WebRTC? https://webrtc.org Seems like it supports exactly what you're looking for. SignalR is more for real-time messages, not really for streaming.

P2P is nothing new. It is a long-established means of connecting two or more people directly over a network. Web browsers are very capable of a wide range of P2P connections. Many apps use WebRTC to enhance realtime apps, but it is still an underutilized technology. Even with WebRTC, many apps are designed around the dependence on a central app server with WebRTC performing a user experience enhancement. Web meshes turn this idea on its head: Instead of using P2P connections to enhance the user experience, what if P2P connections were the foundation of the user experience? In other words, what if there was no central server?