morphologica VS metapp

I replaced jsoncpp with nlohmann in my C++ graphing library morphologica recently. I did so because nlohmann is header-only and I wanted to present a header-only library myself. I hope you're not going to tell me that jsoncpp can be used header-only :)

And you'd pass in a reference to or a copy of the data defining the surface. An example of a similar class to follow is https://github.com/ABRG-Models/morphologica/blob/main/morph/HexGridVisual.h which draws a surface for a 'HexGrid', a class I've used to solve systems on hexagonal grids. Here's an example image: https://github.com/ABRG-Models/morphologica/tree/main/examples#hexgridcpp

https://github.com/wqking/metapp Need to register your struct to a wrapper manually.

My recent working on libraries are focusing on solving the problems you have. metapp is a runtime reflection library, jsonpp is a simple JSON library basing on metapp. More important, the meta data built in metapp is reusable for different purpose, such as serialization, scripting, etc.

Reusable technology. The core technology is from C++ reflection library metapp developed by the same developer (wqking) of jsonpp. The technology is not unique to jsonpp, it's reusable for other purposes such as runtime reflection system, serialization, script binding, etc.

You may read Core concepts and mechanism for some basic concepts. If you wonder how it parses the mystery type char const *(*(* volatile * (&)[][8])())[], or even 10 times more complicated type, it's not magic, it uses recursive template specialization.