lightningcss
wpt
lightningcss | wpt | |
---|---|---|
11 | 20 | |
5,966 | 4,632 | |
2.0% | 1.0% | |
8.7 | 10.0 | |
6 days ago | 3 days ago | |
Rust | HTML | |
Mozilla Public License 2.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
lightningcss
-
I'm fed up with it, so I'm writing a browser
Would you consider using some libraries in your project? There are lots of good ones in the Rust ecosystem, and many of them are not part of any existing browsers.
For example:
- https://github.com/servo/html5ever (HTML parsing - note: this is used in Servo)
- https://github.com/parcel-bundler/lightningcss (CSS parsing)
- https://github.com/DioxusLabs/taffy (web layout)
- https://github.com/pop-os/cosmic-text (text layout and rendering)
Obviously you should be free to work on whatever you like, but just as a benchmark on the scope of your project: I spent ~6 months implementing just the CSS Grid algorithm in Taffy last year. An entire browser from literal scratch is probably a 10 year project for one person.
- LightningCSS Benchmark
-
We're building a browser when it's supposed to be impossible
Libraries for a lot of this stuff exist (albeit in many cases not very mature yet):
- https://github.com/pop-os/cosmic-text does text layout (which Taffy explicitly considers out of scope)
- https://github.com/AccessKit/accesskit does accessibility
- https://github.com/servo/rust-cssparser does value-agnostic CSS parsing (it will parse the general syntax but leaves value parsing up to the user, meaning you can easily add support for whatever properties you what). Libraries like https://github.com/parcel-bundler/lightningcss implement parsing for the standard css properties.
- There are crates like https://github.com/BurntSushi/bstr and https://docs.rs/wtf8/latest/wtf8/ for working with non-unicode text
We are planning to add a C API to Taffy, but tbh I feel like C is not very good for this kind of modularised approach. You really want to be able to expose complex APIs with enforced type safety and this isn't possible with C.
-
Help with "returns a value referencing data owned by the current function"
Background: I encountered this problem using lightningcss.
-
On Using Rust in Parcel and Vitest
You can do it - that's actually exactly what my project is doing. I have a single repository with a Rust project, that builds the .wasm file (+ .d.ts + .js) using wasm-pack, and a Node.js project, that uses this .wasm file. There's no problem in packing that and exposing as a npm package. See parcel-bundler/lightningcss for a full blown example (it's not using wasm-pack but builds the Rust project directly).
- An fast CSS parser, transformer, bundler, and minifier written in Rust
- Parcel-Css - A CSS parser, transformer, and minifier written in Rust.
- ParcelCSS – A CSS parser, transformer, and minifier written in Rust
-
Parcel CSS: A new CSS parser, compiler, and minifier
Initial commit, 9 Oct 2021. That is pretty new.
wpt
-
Show HN: Dropflow, a CSS layout engine for node or <canvas>
To reply mostly with my WPT Core Team hat off, mostly summarising the history of how we've ended up here:
A build script used by significant swaths of the test suite is almost certainly out; it turns out people like being able to edit the tests they're actually running. (We _do_ have some build scripts — but they're mostly just mechanically generating lots of similar tests.
A lot of the goal of WPT (and the HTML Test Suite, which it effectively grew out of) has been to have a test suite that browsers are actually running in CI: historically, most standards test suites haven't been particularly amenable to automation (often a lot of, or exclusively, manual tests, little concern for flakiness, etc.), and with a lot of policy choices that effectively made browser vendors choose to write tests for themselves and not add new tests to the shared test suite: if you make it notably harder to write tests for the shared test suite, most engineers at a given vendor are simply going to not bother.
As such, there's a lot of hesitancy towards anything that regresses the developer experience for browser engineers (and realistically, browser engineers, by virtue of sheer number, are the ones who are writing the most tests for web technologies).
That said, there are probably ways we could make things better: a decent number of tests for things like Grid use check-layout-th.js (e.g., https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/blob/f763dd7d7b7ed...).
One could definitely imagine a world in which these are a test type of their own, and the test logic (in check-layout-th.js) can be rewritten in a custom test harness to do the same comparisons in an implementation without any JS support.
The other challenge for things like Taffy only targeting flexbox and grid is we're unlikely to add any easy way to distinguish tests which are testing interactions with other layout features (`position: absolute` comes to mind!).
My suggestion would probably be to start with an issue at https://github.com/web-platform-tests/rfcs/issues, describing the rough constraints, and potentially with one or two possible solutions.
-
The Ladybird Browser Project
It also helps that there are tests
https://web-platform-tests.org/
-
Making Web Component properties behave closer to the platform
You can see how Mozilla tests the compliance of their built-in elements in the Gecko repository (the ok and is assertions are defined in their SimpleTest testing framework). And here's the Web Platform Tests' reflection harness, with data for each built-in element in sibling files, that almost every browser pass.
-
We're building a browser when it's supposed to be impossible
We have our own test suite (orginally derived from the test suite of Meta's Yoga layout library [0]) which consists of text fixtures that are small HTML snippets [1] and a test harness [2] that turns those into runnable tests, utilising headless chrome both to parse the HTML and to generate the assertions based on the layout that Chrome renders (so we are effectively comparing our implementation against Chrome). We currently have 686 generated tests (covering both Flexbox and CSS Grid).
We would like to utilise the Web Platform Test suite [3], however these are not in a standard format and many of the tests require JavaScript so we are not currently able to do that.
[0]: https://github.com/facebook/yoga
[1]: https://github.com/DioxusLabs/taffy/tree/main/test_fixtures
[2]: https://github.com/DioxusLabs/taffy/tree/main/scripts/gentes...
[3]: https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/css/cs...
-
What new CSS and JavaScript features can we expect soon? Or is it all unexpected?
The metrics are based on the passing rate for the web-platform-tests (WPT) project, the automated test suite for web standards. The completion rate is categorised as either stable, or experimental. There is no definition of what experimental entails, presumably features that are behind experimental flags are included. Stable is better to go off in any case.
-
[AskJS] MSE quality resources
Depends on what you are trying to achieve. You can run WPT MSE https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/media-source and WebCodecs https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/webcodecs tests manually to learn by doing.
-
Rookie question: How do I know I am making progress with my JS learning?
Manually running the tests in Web Platform Tests should keep you busy.
-
Browsers Running Old JS Engines
Not sure what you mean? I referred to Web API's, which generally means Web platform API's; that is Web platform API's tested by Web Platform Tests https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt.
-
State of CSS
If you want CSS to be the same across browsers then help implement CSS tests and file bugs
https://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/Overview.en.html
https://web-platform-tests.org/
better specs are great, but tests will actually find the edge cases and lead to more convergence.
-
How do I go about learning advanced DOM manipulation with vanilla JS?
Run all these tests locally https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/dom.
What are some alternatives?
PostCSS - Transforming styles with JS plugins
browsh - A fully-modern text-based browser, rendering to TTY and browsers
swc - Rust-based platform for the Web
firefox-ios - Firefox for iOS
rust-cssparser - Rust implementation of CSS Syntax Level 3
linkedom - A triple-linked lists based DOM implementation.
parse5 - HTML parsing/serialization toolset for Node.js. WHATWG HTML Living Standard (aka HTML5)-compliant.
firefox-user.js-tool - Interactive view, compare, and more for Firefox user.js (eg arkenfox/user.js) + about:config functions
x-ray - The next web scraper. See through the <html> noise.
caniuse - Raw browser/feature support data from caniuse.com
excel-stream
ioccc - My IOCCC submissions and practice.