Keras VS fastapi

Keras

As a beginner, I was looking for something simple and flexible for developing deep learning models and that is when I found Keras. Many AI/ML professionals appreciate Keras for its simplicity and efficiency in prototyping and developing deep learning models, making it a preferred choice, especially for beginners and for projects requiring rapid development.

After setting the variables for the environment, the next step is to install dependencies. To use Gemma, KerasNLP is the dependency used. KerasNLP is a collection of natural language processing (NLP) models implemented in Keras and runnable on JAX, PyTorch, and TensorFlow.

All breaking changes are listed here: https://github.com/keras-team/keras/issues/18467

You can use this migration guide to identify and fix each of these issues (and further, making your code run on JAX or PyTorch): https://keras.io/guides/migrating_to_keras_3/

I'm guessing the "real" keras code is coming from the keras repository. Is that a correct assumption? How does that version of Keras get there? If I wanted to write my own activation layer next to ELU, where exactly would I do that?

Other popular machine learning tools include PyTorch, Keras, and Scikit-learn. PyTorch is an open-source machine learning library developed by Facebook that is known for its ease of use and flexibility. Keras is a high-level neural networks API that is written in Python and is known for its simplicity. Scikit-learn is a machine learning library for Python that is used for data analysis and data mining tasks.

Click to Learn more...

I'm not aware of anything off-the-shelf, but if you have sufficient programming experience, one way to do this would be to build a large dataset of reference images and pictures and use something like keras to train a convolutional neural network on them.

He is probably most well know for creating FastAPI that I taught to some of my clients and Typer that I've never used.

It has been an interesting exercise developing this wrapper component. The fact that it seamlessly integrates with the FastAPI framework is just a bonus for me; I didn't plan for it since I hadn't learned FastAPI at the time. I hope you find this post useful. Thank you for reading, and stay safe as always.

FastAPI is a modern, high-performance web framework for building APIs with Python, based on standard Python type hints.

In this tutorial, I will demonstrate how to use Burr, an open source framework (disclosure: I helped create it), using simple OpenAI client calls to GPT4, and FastAPI to create a custom email assistant agent. We’ll describe the challenge one faces and then how you can solve for them. For the application frontend we provide a reference implementation but won’t dive into details for it.

That’s when I found FastAPI.

FastAPI & Uvicorn

Discussion at FastAPI GitHub: https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/issues/2696

An API application framework (such as FastAPI)

It’s been my experience that async Python frameworks tend to turn IO bound problems into CPU bound problems with a high enough request rate, because due to their nature they act as unbounded queues.

This ends up made worse if you’re using sync routes.

If you’re constrained on a resource such as a database connection pool, your framework will continue to pull http requests off the wire that a sane client will cancel and retry due to timeouts because it takes too long to get a connection out of the pool. Since there isn’t a straightforward way to cancel the execution of a route handler in every Python http framework I’ve seen exhibit this problem, the problem quickly snowballs.

This is an issue with fastapi, too- https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/issues/5759

Fast API.