Keras VS scikit-learn

The unchallenged leader in AI development is still Python. and Keras, and robust community support.

>Chollet, a French computer scientist and one of the industry’s sharpest skeptics

I feel like this description really buries the lede on Chollet's expertise. (For those who don't know, he's the creator of and lead contributor[0] to Keras)

[0]https://github.com/keras-team/keras/graphs/contributors

Keras API reference

Star on GitHub ⭐ - Keras

At its heart is TensorFlow Core, which provides low-level APIs for building custom models and performing computations using tensors (multi-dimensional arrays). It has a high-level API, Keras, which simplifies the process of building machine learning models. It also has a large community, where you can share ideas, contribute, and get help if you are stuck.

(https://dev-to-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/articles/92cup4lywcjfq83xg0ea.png)

The core model architecture for Magika was implemented using Keras, a popular open source deep learning framework that enables Google researchers to experiment quickly with new models.

Keras

7. Scikit-learn - Machine Learning

Python’s Growth in Data Work and AI: Python continues to lead because of its easy-to-read style and the huge number of libraries available for tasks from data work to artificial intelligence. Tools like TensorFlow and PyTorch make it a must-have. Whether you’re experienced or just starting, Python’s clear style makes it a good choice for diving into machine learning. Actionable Tip: If you’re new to Python, try projects that combine data with everyday problems. For example, build a simple recommendation system using Pandas and scikit-learn.

scikit-learn (optional): Useful for additional training or evaluation tasks.

The race condition bugs are typically hidden by different software layers. For instance, we found one that involves OpenBLAS's pthreads-based thread pool management and maybe its scipy bindings:

- https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/21479

it might be the same as this one that further involves OpenMP code generated by Cython:

- https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/30151

We haven't managed to write minimal reproducers for either of those but as you can observe, those race conditions can only be triggered when composing many independently developed components.

Visit the repository and explore examples.

How to Accomplish: Utilize data splitting tools in libraries like Scikit-learn to partition your dataset. Make sure the split mirrors the real-world distribution of your data to avoid biased evaluations.

Online Courses: Coursera: "Machine Learning" by Andrew Ng edX: "Introduction to Machine Learning" by MIT Tutorials: Scikit-learn documentation: https://scikit-learn.org/ Kaggle Learn: https://www.kaggle.com/learn Books: "Hands-On Machine Learning with Scikit-Learn, Keras & TensorFlow" by Aurélien Géron "The Elements of Statistical Learning" by Trevor Hastie, Robert Tibshirani, and Jerome Friedman By understanding the core concepts of logistic regression, its limitations, and exploring further resources, you'll be well-equipped to navigate the exciting world of machine learning!

Thank you for your interest. There are some interesting examples in the SWE-bench-lite benchmark which are resolved by AutoCodeRover:

- From sympy: https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/13643. AutoCodeRover's patch for it: https://github.com/nus-apr/auto-code-rover/blob/main/results...

- Another one from scikit-learn: https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/13070. AutoCodeRover's patch (https://github.com/nus-apr/auto-code-rover/blob/main/results...) modified a few lines below (compared to the developer patch) and wrote a different comment.

There are more examples in the results directory (https://github.com/nus-apr/auto-code-rover/tree/main/results).

sklearn is adding support through the dataframe interchange protocol (https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/issues/25896). scipy, as far as I know, doesn't explicitly support dataframes (it just happens to work when you wrap a Series in `np.array` or `np.asarray`). I don't know about PyTorch but in general you can convert to numpy.

Wow, from the upvotes on this comment, it really seems like a lot of people think that this is the correct behavior! I have to say I disagree, but if that's what you think, don't just sit there upvoting comments on Reddit; instead go to this PR and tell the Scikit-Learn maintainers not to "fix" this "bug", which they are currently planning to do!