finetuner VS RWKV-LM

And all of that has something to do with finetuners. It basically fine-tunes AI models for specific use cases. With it can create a custom search experience that is tailored to their specific needs. I also wonder how this is going to be integrated into SEO tools soon since those tools are catered to traditional search engines.

Combining multiple lists into one is tough, but it's doable if you have the right approach. Fine-tuning GPT-3 might help, but finding enough examples is tough. You could use existing text data or manually label a set of training examples. A finetuner could be help too. It's a platform-agnostic toolkit that can fine-tune pre-trained models and it's customizable to do lots of tasks.

You can adjust the pause threshold a little longer for pauses between and phrases. You can also use the phrase detection mode, which sets a time limit for the entire phrase instead of ending the transcription prematurely. If your microphone sensitivity is low, you can also try adjusting the energy threshold. If you want, you can use finetuners.

It's possible that completion results may be identical to fine-tuned examples, but not guaranteed. Even with the same prompt, slight variations in output are expected due to the nature of probabilistic language models. You can experiment with different settings and parameters, including those with finetuners like these.

You can try creating your own dataset. Get some audio data that you want, preprocess it, and then create a custom dataset you can use to fine tune. You could use finetuners like these if you want as well.

We derived the dataset by pre-processing the deepfashion dataset using Finetuner. The image label generated by Finetuner is extracted and formatted to produce the text attribute of each product.

You can either use Hugging Face Transformers as they have a lot of pre-trained models that you can customize. Or Finetuners like this one: which is a toolkit for fine-tuning multiple models.

Very recently, a few non-English and multilingual CLIP models have appeared, using various sources of training data. In this article, we’ll evaluate a multilingual CLIP model’s performance in a language other than English, and show how you can improve it even further using Jina AI’s Finetuner.

I think you can convert your data into text and fine-tune the model on it. But that might not be the ideal way to go since you kind of base that on the model. Try transfer learning or finetuning with a finetuner.

you can try prompt-based classification or fine-tuning with a Finetuner. Prompts work well for simple tasks but fine-tuning may give better results for complex ones. Althouigh it's going to need more resources, but try both and see what works best for you.

https://github.com/BlinkDL/RWKV-LM#rwkv-discord-httpsdiscord... lists a number of implementations of various versions of RWKV.

https://github.com/BlinkDL/RWKV-LM#rwkv-parallelizable-rnn-w... :

> RWKV: Parallelizable RNN with Transformer-level LLM Performance (pronounced as "RwaKuv", from 4 major params: R W K V)

> RWKV is an RNN with Transformer-level LLM performance, which can also be directly trained like a GPT transformer (parallelizable). And it's 100% attention-free. You only need the hidden state at position t to compute the state at position t+1. You can use the "GPT" mode to quickly compute the hidden state for the "RNN" mode.

> So it's combining the best of RNN and transformer - great performance, fast inference, saves VRAM, fast training, "infinite" ctx_len, and free sentence embedding (using the final hidden state).

> "Our latest version is RWKV-6,*

That is not true. There are RNNs with transformer/LLM-like performance. See https://github.com/BlinkDL/RWKV-LM.

This is what RWKV (https://github.com/BlinkDL/RWKV-LM) was made for, and what it will be good at.

Wow. Pretty darn cool! <3 :'))))

Thanks for the support! Two weeks ago, I'd have said longer contexts on small on-device LLMs are at least a year away, but developments from last week seem to indicate that it's well within reach. Once the low hanging product features are done, I think it's a worthy problem to spend a couple of weeks or perhaps even months on. Speaking of context lengths, recurrent models like RWKV technically have infinite context lengths, but in practice the context slowly fades away after a few thousands of tokens.

This is the reason there are only a few AI labs, and they show little of the theoretical and scientific understanding you believe is required. Go check their code, there's nothing there. Even the transformer with it's heads and other architectural elements turns out to not do anything and it is less efficient than RNNs. (see https://github.com/BlinkDL/RWKV-LM)

I've been pondering the same thing, as simply extending the context window in a straightforward manner would lead to a significant increase in computational resources. I've had the opportunity to experiment with Anthropics' 100k model, and it's evident that they're employing some clever techniques to make it work, albeit with some imperfections. One interesting observation is that their prompt guide recommends placing instructions after the reference text when inputting lengthy text bodies. I noticed that the model often disregarded the instructions if placed beforehand. It's clear that the model doesn't allocate the same level of "attention" to all parts of the input across the entire context window.

Moreover, the inability to cache transformers makes the use of large context windows quite costly, as all previous messages must be sent with each call. In this context, the RWKV-LM project on GitHub (https://github.com/BlinkDL/RWKV-LM) might offer a solution. They claim to achieve performance comparable to transformers using an RNN, which could potentially handle a 100-page document and cache it, thereby eliminating the need to process the entire document with each subsequent query. However, I suspect RWKV might fall short in handling complex tasks that require maintaining multiple variables in memory, such as mathematical computations, but it should suffice for many scenarios.

On a related note, I believe Anthropics' Claude is somewhat underappreciated. In some instances, it outperforms GPT4, and I'd rank it somewhere between GPT4 and Bard overall.

> The only reason open-source LLMs have a heartbeat is they’re standing on Meta’s weights.

Not necessarily.

RWKV, for example, is a different architecture that wasn't based on Facebook's weights whatsoever. I don't know where BlinkDL (the author) got the training data, but they seem to have done everything mostly independently otherwise.

https://github.com/BlinkDL/RWKV-LM

disclaimer: I've been doing a lot of work lately on an implementation of CPU inference for this model, so I'm obviously somewhat biased since this is the model I have the most experience in.

I think the main concern is that, due to the resources put into LLM research for finding new ways to refine and improve them, that work can then be used by projects that do go the extra mile and create things that are more than just LLMs. For example, RWKV is similar to an LLM but will actually change its own model after every processed token, thus letting it remember things longer-term without the use of 'context tokens'.