ebib VS org-fc

YMMV, but I would personally recommend ebib + zotra as a Zotero replacment. I used Zotero and org-cite for a few months but then dropped Zotero and went for a pure Emacs solution. I'm very pleased with the results.

Nice work! I switch from Zotero to ebib and have used the Zotero translation server for a long time. It's nice to see a dedicated package. It would be much appreciated if you could support ebib like https://github.com/joostkremers/ebib/issues/220 then I can remove the funs in my configs.

Yes, I do use a citation manager. I've used Zotero with BibLatex export in the past, but now use ebib directly inside Emacs (and which directly reads and writes Bib(La)tex). Pandoc's use of CSL for citation styling is really convenient, and mostly works great. I wasn't so sure if I could format citations and references just as easily using org-export.

This didn't work. I got a warning that the package ebib-biblio could not be found. I realised that this was because I was using the straight version of use-package, which (only?) looks for packages in the repos, when in this case ebib-biblio is distributes as part of ebib. This didn't produce any warnings:

ebib.

An emacs-only solution would be the ebib package (https://github.com/joostkremers/ebib).

I have tried org-drill but decided against it and other Emacs options including chenyanming/anki.el, eyeinsky/org-anki, l3kn/org-fc and abo-abo/pamparam in the end. They all work as advertised and all use or a slight variation of the same SM2 algorithm used by Anki. They all use this one as it is publicly available.

org-fc has been great to work with. It's been easy to confirm and use. The dashboard is also nice. Do have a look.

org-fc can handle what you would like to do. You can find install instructions here, I don't know exactly how doom works but I imagine you can get what you need there.