easyVmaf VS ffsubsync

We use a tool called easyVmaf, which makes VMAF-analysis very easy. However, just like with transcoding, this process takes a lot of time to run sequentially on your own machine. If you need to analyze hundreds of files, this will take a very long time. Running this in a container in the cloud means we can run all the processes at the same time in parallel. We built a simple Docker-container that runs easyVmaf on files in a S3-bucket. This allows us to run the container on ECS and spin up as many tasks as we need. This Dockerfile can be found in the GitHub-repository.

> Another giveaway is the ratio of stars to watchers / forks. I remember one project with thousands of stars but only 10 users "watching" it. They went on to raise a sizable seed round too.

Not necessarily indicative of foul play. I have two projects like this (https://github.com/smacke/ffsubsync and https://github.com/ipyflow/ipyflow) and I attribute it to not having great developer documentation.

Try alass or ffsubsync.

You can check and repair them with https://github.com/smacke/ffsubsync which is ideal for subs that are off because of an edited/cut/added intro or commercials

Yes if you use subsync by itself it emits a pre-synced SRT file. https://github.com/smacke/ffsubsync

https://github.com/smacke/ffsubsync (also wsl/python)

I use ffsubsync which is a command line tool that uses ffmpeg for this exact purpose: ffsubsync