delta
MLflow
delta | MLflow | |
---|---|---|
69 | 56 | |
6,935 | 17,335 | |
1.7% | 1.5% | |
9.8 | 9.9 | |
about 6 hours ago | 6 days ago | |
Scala | Python | |
Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
delta
-
Delta Lake vs. Parquet: A Comparison
Delta is pretty great, let's you do upserts into tables in DataBricks much easier than without it.
I think the website is here: https://delta.io
-
Understanding Parquet, Iceberg and Data Lakehouses
I often hear references to Apache Iceberg and Delta Lake as if they’re two peas in the Open Table Formats pod. Yet…
Here’s the Apache Iceberg table format specification:
https://iceberg.apache.org/spec/
As they like to say in patent law, anyone “skilled in the art” of database systems could use this to build and query Iceberg tables without too much difficulty.
This is nominally the Delta Lake equivalent:
https://github.com/delta-io/delta/blob/master/PROTOCOL.md
I defy anyone to even scope out what level of effort would be required to fully implement the current spec, let alone what would be involved in keeping up to date as this beast evolves.
Frankly, the Delta Lake spec reads like a reverse engineering of whatever implementation tradeoffs Databricks is making as they race to build out a lakehouse for every Fortune 1000 company burned by Hadoop (which is to say, most of them).
My point is that I’ve yet to be convinced that buying into Delta Lake is actually buying into an open ecosystem. Would appreciate any reassurance on this front!
-
Getting Started with Flink SQL, Apache Iceberg and DynamoDB Catalog
Apache Iceberg is one of the three types of lakehouse, the other two are Apache Hudi and Delta Lake.
-
[D] Is there other better data format for LLM to generate structured data?
The Apache Spark / Databricks community prefers Apache parquet or Linux Fundation's delta.io over json.
-
Delta vs Iceberg: make love not war
Delta 3.0 extends an olive branch. https://github.com/delta-io/delta/releases/tag/v3.0.0rc1
-
Databricks Strikes $1.3B Deal for Generative AI Startup MosaicML
Databricks provides Jupyter lab like notebooks for analysis and ETL pipelines using spark through pyspark, sparkql or scala. I think R is supported as well but it doesn't interop as well with their newer features as well as python and SQL do. It interfaces with cloud storage backend like S3 and offers some improvements to the parquet format of data querying that allows for updating, ordering and merged through https://delta.io . They integrate pretty seamlessly to other data visualisation tooling if you want to use it for that but their built in graphs are fine for most cases. They also have ML on rails type through menus and models if I recall but I typically don't use it for that. I've typically used it for ETL or ELT type workflows for data that's too big or isn't stored in a database.
-
The "Big Three's" Data Storage Offerings
Structured, Semi-structured and Unstructured can be stored in one single format, a lakehouse storage format like Delta, Iceberg or Hudi (assuming those don't require low-latency SLAs like subsecond).
-
Ideas/Suggestions around setting up a data pipeline from scratch
As the data source, what I have is a gRPC stream. I get data in protobuf encoded format from it. This is a fixed part in the overall system, there is no other way to extract the data. We plan to ingest this data in delta lake, but before we do that there are a few problems.
-
Medallion/lakehouse architecture data modelling
Take a look at Delta Lake https://delta.io, it enables a lot of database-like actions on files
-
CSV or Parquet File Format
I prefer parquet (or delta for larger datasets. CSV for very small datasets, or the ones that will be later used/edited in Excel or Googke sheets.
MLflow
-
Observations on MLOps–A Fragmented Mosaic of Mismatched Expectations
How can this be? The current state of practice in AI/ML work requires adaptivity, which is uncommon in classical computational fields. There are myriad tools that capture the work across the many instances of the AI/ML lifecycle. The idea that any one tool could sufficiently capture the dynamic work is unrealistic. Take, for example, an experiment tracking tool like W&B or MLFlow; some form of experiment tracking is necessary in typical model training lifecycles. Such a tool requires some notion of a dataset. However, a tool focusing on experiment tracking is orthogonal to the needs of analyzing model performance at the data sample level, which is critical to understanding the failure modes of models. The way one does this depends on the type of data and the AI/ML task at hand. In other words, MLOps is inherently an intricate mosaic, as the capabilities and best practices of AI/ML work evolve.
-
My Favorite DevTools to Build AI/ML Applications!
MLflow is an open-source platform for managing the end-to-end machine learning lifecycle. It includes features for experiment tracking, model versioning, and deployment, enabling developers to track and compare experiments, package models into reproducible runs, and manage model deployment across multiple environments.
-
Exploring Open-Source Alternatives to Landing AI for Robust MLOps
Platforms such as MLflow monitor the development stages of machine learning models. In parallel, Data Version Control (DVC) brings version control system-like functions to the realm of data sets and models.
-
cascade alternatives - clearml and MLflow
3 projects | 1 Nov 2023
-
EL5: Difference between OpenLLM, LangChain, MLFlow
MLFlow - http://mlflow.org
- Explain me how websites like Dall-E, chatgpt, thispersondoesntexit process the user data so quickly
- [D] What licensed software do you use for machine learning experimentation tracking?
-
Exploring MLOps Tools and Frameworks: Enhancing Machine Learning Operations
MLflow:
-
Options for configuration of python libraries - Stack Overflow
In search for a tool that needs comparable configuration I looked into mlflow and found this. https://github.com/mlflow/mlflow/blob/master/mlflow/environment_variables.py There they define a class _EnvironmentVariable and create many objects out of it, for any variable they need. The get method of this class is in principle a decorated os.getenv. Maybe that is something I can take as orientation.
-
[D] Is there a tool to keep track of my ML experiments?
I have been using DVC and MLflow since then DVC had only data tracking and MLflow only model tracking. I can say both are awesome now and maybe the only factor I would like to mention is that IMO, MLflow is a bit harder to learn while DVC is just a git practically.
What are some alternatives?
dvc - 🦉 ML Experiments and Data Management with Git
clearml - ClearML - Auto-Magical CI/CD to streamline your AI workload. Experiment Management, Data Management, Pipeline, Orchestration, Scheduling & Serving in one MLOps/LLMOps solution
Apache Cassandra - Mirror of Apache Cassandra
Sacred - Sacred is a tool to help you configure, organize, log and reproduce experiments developed at IDSIA.
lakeFS - lakeFS - Data version control for your data lake | Git for data
zenml - ZenML 🙏: Build portable, production-ready MLOps pipelines. https://zenml.io.
hudi - Upserts, Deletes And Incremental Processing on Big Data.
guildai - Experiment tracking, ML developer tools
delta-rs - A native Rust library for Delta Lake, with bindings into Python
iceberg - Apache Iceberg
tensorflow - An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone