Natron VS blender

Kdenlive (Website| Documentation | Source code) for video editing and Natron2 (Website | Documentation | Source code) for VFX. Both are free and open source software but still good editors.

Reminded me to check out Natron to see if it was still moving along. It's branded as a video compositor. Might be worth playing with them both again.

https://github.com/NatronGitHub/Natron

There's also the open source compositor Natron, heavily inspired by Nuke: https://github.com/NatronGitHub/Natron

How does this compare to a compositor like say Natron? https://github.com/NatronGitHub/Natron

what is your thought on https://github.com/NatronGitHub/Natron ?

Please try looking through some large open source projects and contributing major contributions by familiarizing yourself with the code base, learning multiple programming languages, and not having major bugs in your code. I'd imagine you wouldn't want to do this.

Here is a weblink: https://github.com/blender/blender

This for example is the complete source for blenders procedural noise functions: https://github.com/blender/blender/blob/main/source/blender/blenlib/intern/noise.cc

Maybe you're only using object lights. To make it look like Material Preview, you'd want to use an environment texture [instead]. If you don't want to have to find them in the blender folders, here are the ones listed in Material Preview, forest.exr being the default

forest.exr https://github.com/blender/blender/tree/master/release/datafiles/studiolights/world

Everything was good. And then a developer decided to abandon the custom CLAMP macro and use the standard std::clamp function. And the commit that supposed to make the code better looked like this:

Or simply git clone official public mirror and build it yourself.