Microsoft.Maui.Graphics
IdentityServer
Microsoft.Maui.Graphics | IdentityServer | |
---|---|---|
11 | 16 | |
677 | 1,341 | |
- | 2.5% | |
0.0 | 9.4 | |
11 months ago | 5 days ago | |
C# | JavaScript | |
MIT License | DUENDE™ SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Microsoft.Maui.Graphics
-
Discussion Thread
Microsoft.Maui.Graphics (which relies on Skia anyway but whatever)
-
GlyphTypeface without WPF
I'm not sure if this is out of scope for https://github.com/dotnet/Microsoft.Maui.Graphics, but that seems to be the designated successor to the platform-specific graphics libs.
-
ImageSharp leaving the .NET Foundation due to licensing change
Yea, they can keep using the old versions, but that locks them out of the new versions and breaks expectations, especially since they were a member of the .NET Foundation. So it's up to them to keep using a version that won't get fixes or new features or accept the new license.
This whole thing just points out how hard all of this is to get right. I understand both sides. But I do at least get the feeling that the ImageSharp team is a bit high strung.
https://github.com/dotnet/Microsoft.Maui.Graphics/issues/47
I think this is probably an intentional move to move away from Microsoft and the .NET Foundation in addition to trying to capitalize on people making a lot of money from the software package.
After having looked at the license, it seems reasonable enough to me aside from the technicalities others have brought up. The vvvv tool follows a similar license of, it's free unless you make money from it.
-
Manipulate individual pixels
You can also write a MAUI app and then use https://github.com/dotnet/Microsoft.Maui.Graphics.
-
Roundup of .NET MAUI - Week of June 27, 2022
This set of SkiaSharp views can be added to any .NET MAUI application for drawing. This is similar to what you can do with the built-in GraphicsView and Microsoft.Maui.Graphics, but directly to SkiaSharp.
-
Minimalistic fluent api in C# to create complex reactive Avalonia applications
There's Microsoft.Maui.Graphics as well so that the renderer will not rely on native controls just like Avalonia and Flutter (but currently it's experimental). MAUI's flexible enough to enable that scenario, the bigger question is more on motivation from either MS or the community to make it happen.
-
Views in Comet
For colors you have your choice of solid paint, linear and radial gradient paint, and more provided by Microsoft.Maui.Graphics.
-
ASP.NET Core updates in .NET 6 Release Candidate 2 - Native dependencies for Blazor WebAssembly!
This work is a pre-cursor to Blazor WebAssembly support coming in the Microsoft.MAUI.Graphics repo, giving us a single .Net API to draw on all platforms MAUI supports, along with Blazor.
-
Creating a new image from file path in .NET 5.0
In .NET 6, there will be Microsoft.Maui.Graphics (doesn't depend on Maui, despite its name).
- Does anyone know if MAUI will have its own graphic libraries or will we need to use Skia Sharp or use the new Xamarin drawing capabilities?
IdentityServer
-
Identity server 4
Its deprecated in favor of Duende Identityserver which introduced a license model.
-
How does cookie based authentication work?
Tokens usually have a lifetime and they are separate from the user's authentication principals like username and password. Unless you are rolling your own form of token provider (not something that would be recommended) the token creation is handled for you. Take a look at https://identityserver4.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ or if your organization makes under 1M in income a year the free version of what Identity Server progressed into https://duendesoftware.com/products/identityserver
- Ask HN: Examples of Top C# Code?
-
ImageSharp leaving the .NET Foundation due to licensing change
I think Duende (Identity Server) handled the situation pretty well.
https://duendesoftware.com/products/identityserver
> Standard License Pricing
-
Seeking people for collaboration on open source projects I started. Also open to ideas. Preferably long-term. I can help you learn and you can help me with other things, such as coding, UI and more. Beginner friendly. Safe environment.
Thanks for your message. No, the idea was not to re-implement OAuth nor OpenID stuff. What I had in mind for the authentication thingy was something like this: https://laravel.com/docs/9.x/sanctum. If we want to go the OAuth/OpenID way, in .NET we have this one: https://github.com/DuendeSoftware/IdentityServer.
- If you were tasked with implementing Identity and Access Management today, what would you do?
-
Bytebase: 20-Person Startup, 30 SaaS Services, and $1,183 Monthly Bill
> As you said, there are plenty of local options that you only need to run.
I think managed databases are a good analogy here. While I might run my own PostgreSQL/MariaDB instance, many out there won't be overjoyed at the idea of actually needing to run and manage the damned thing, as well as set up some kind of alerting and handling the need to eventually scale it up.
> It also has the largest risk of compromise and data leaking from any service you may use...
PII is definitely a big concern, even if something like password hashes aren't too useful on their own (provided that they're salted), though in cases like that it might actually make a lot of sense to utilize a widely used and tested solution that's specialized for this particular use case.
In many cases, thousands of people across the globe will be able to develop something and squash any bugs in it better than you might be able to do individually or with your own team, though there might be a few exceptions out there. Auth is probably not one of the cases where you want to write code without a lot of eyes on it.
> ...the largest amount of potential lock-in...
This is debatable: standards like OAuth2 and OIDC technically make many of the solutions and libraries way more pluggable and make it easier to choose between various implementations, depending on your needs.
Of course, something like Keycloak also has its own API (as do many of the cloud offerings) so if you build too much automation around a particular implementation, then that advantage partially goes out the window.
> ...and the least need for integration.
I'm not sure about this, it probably depends on your architecture. If you have a monolithic web app, then you probably don't need a separate turnkey/SaaS solution, whereas if you have an ever growing number of services, whilst you want to manage authentication and accounts against all of them centrally, then something like Keycloak (or one of the cloud alternatives) become way more lucrative.
That said, I'd still opt for self-hostable options whenever possible, albeit I also don't trust cloud based password managers and such, preferring something like KeePass instead. I've probably just come to a different conclusion in regards to usability/responsibility/features/security than some other people.
Sadly, there aren't that many good options out there at the moment, apart from Keycloak. For example, IdentityServer is promising, but went in a commercial direction: https://duendesoftware.com/products/identityserver#pricing
-
Why is authentication such a sh*t show with .NET 6?
He's referring to IdentityServer 3/4, which was open sourced, and was not owned by Microsoft. That 3rd party is commercializing their work (and to be fair, it's a lot of work) as https://duendesoftware.com/products/identityserver , and has a different commercial licensing model.
-
Show HN: Open-Source Identity Server Written in Go (Ory Kratos)
https://github.com/DuendeSoftware/IdentityServer/blob/main/L... does not seem to square with any definition of "open source" I'm familiar with, and that goes double for having an in-repo file that just says "read this unversioned pdf on some other site"
-
Creating JWT token auth yourself - is it secure?
I would not recommend it. There is a server named Duende identity server which you can host locally.
What are some alternatives?
SkiaSharp - SkiaSharp is a cross-platform 2D graphics API for .NET platforms based on Google's Skia Graphics Library. It provides a comprehensive 2D API that can be used across mobile, server and desktop models to render images.
Keycloak - Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services
FFImageLoading - Fast & Furious Image Loading - Image loading, caching & transforming library for Xamarin and Windows
openiddict-core - Flexible and versatile OAuth 2.0/OpenID Connect stack for .NET
MTAdmob - Admob plugin for Xamarin Android and iOS
Ory Hydra - OpenID Certified™ OpenID Connect and OAuth Provider written in Go - cloud native, security-first, open source API security for your infrastructure. SDKs for any language. Works with Hardware Security Modules. Compatible with MITREid.
Plugin.AudioRecorder - Audio Recorder plugin for Xamarin and Windows
node-oidc-provider - OpenID Certified™ OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server implementation for Node.js
GraphicsControls - Experimental Microsoft.Maui.Graphics.Controls - Build drawn controls (Cupertino, Fluent and Material)
YARP - A toolkit for developing high-performance HTTP reverse proxy applications.
ASP.NET Core - ASP.NET Core is a cross-platform .NET framework for building modern cloud-based web applications on Windows, Mac, or Linux.
Hot Chocolate - Welcome to the home of the Hot Chocolate GraphQL server for .NET, the Strawberry Shake GraphQL client for .NET and Banana Cake Pop the awesome Monaco based GraphQL IDE.