A tool to detect code paths leading to Rust's panic handler (by Technolution)

Rustig Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to rustig

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better rustig alternative or higher similarity.

Suggest an alternative to rustig

rustig reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of rustig. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-03-10.
  • Things I hate about Rust, redux
    5 projects | | 10 Mar 2022
    There's Rustig which does it for panics, though it seems unmaintained and uses inspection of the final binary rather than source code/AST inspection.
    7 projects | | 10 Mar 2022
    You might be interested in this:
  • Three Things Go Needs More Than Generics
    7 projects | | 3 Oct 2021
    > Doesnt Rust have implicit panics on indexing out of bounds?

    It does yes. A fair number of other constructs can panic as well.

    > I wonder if any codebases lint those away.

    Clippy has a lint for indexing so probably.

    For the general case, it's almost impossible unless you're working on very low-level software (embedded, probably kernel-rust eventually) e.g. `std` assumes allocations can't fail, so any allocation will show up as a panic path. can actually uncover panic paths, but because of the above the results are quite noisy, and while it's possible to uncover bugs thanks to rustig it requires pretty ridiculous amounts of filtering.

  • Linus Torvalds on Rust support in kernel
    6 projects | | 16 Apr 2021
    This comment is strongly confused.

    > [1]

    That's a binary analysis tool. It is only approximate, and does not claim to be an accurate analysis like unsafe-checking and typechecking are:

    > All paths leading to panic! from one of those functions (whether actually used or not) will be reported.

    It also only works on x86_64 binaries.

    Panics are an ugly leftover from the bad old days before Rust had nice monad-like syntax for Result error-handling (the "?" syntax). It's time for panic to sunset.

    6 projects | | 16 Apr 2021
    This comment is strongly missinformed:

    1- panicking allocations are here to stay, because in lots of case, it's the most convenient behavior. BUT Rust is adding fallible allocations methods (prefixed with try_) which return a result instead of panicking in allocation failure.

    2- panics are catch-able as long as you don't compile your binary with panic=abort setting (and as long as you don't panic in your panic handler itself)

    3- panics can only occur in specific places (array indexing, allocations, utf-8 validation, unwrap, etc.) which are by definition known at compile-time, and there's tooling to catch these up [1].

    In practice, a might_panic annotation would add a lot of noise for pretty much everybody, because most of us mortals use panicking function all days and it's not a big deal. Obviously it is critical for Linux, but because it's relevant only to the minority of rust users, it doesn't make sense to include it in rustc itself: it's exactly the kind of situation where external tooling is the good option.



Basic rustig repo stats
10 months ago

Technolution/rustig is an open source project licensed under GNU General Public License v3.0 or later which is an OSI approved license.

SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
Find remote jobs at our new job board There are 9 new remote jobs listed recently.
Are you hiring? Post a new remote job listing for free.