proposal

Go Project Design Documents (by golang)

Proposal Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to proposal

  1. rust

    2,802 proposal VS rust

    Empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.

  2. CodeRabbit

    CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.

    CodeRabbit logo
  3. go

    2,237 proposal VS go

    The Go programming language

  4. kubernetes

    Production-Grade Container Scheduling and Management

  5. asdf

    Extendable version manager with support for Ruby, Node.js, Elixir, Erlang & more

  6. Nim

    356 proposal VS Nim

    Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. It combines successful concepts from mature languages like Python, Ada and Modula. Its design focuses on efficiency, expressiveness, and elegance (in that order of priority).

  7. FizzBuzz Enterprise Edition

    FizzBuzz Enterprise Edition is a no-nonsense implementation of FizzBuzz made by serious businessmen for serious business purposes.

  8. SaaSHub

    SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives

    SaaSHub logo
  9. crystal

    246 proposal VS crystal

    The Crystal Programming Language

  10. v

    227 proposal VS v

    Simple, fast, safe, compiled language for developing maintainable software. Compiles itself in <1s with zero library dependencies. Supports automatic C => V translation. https://vlang.io

  11. too-many-lists

    Learn Rust by writing Entirely Too Many linked lists

  12. Gin

    165 proposal VS Gin

    Gin is a HTTP web framework written in Go (Golang). It features a Martini-like API with much better performance -- up to 40 times faster. If you need smashing performance, get yourself some Gin.

  13. ponyc

    Pony is an open-source, actor-model, capabilities-secure, high performance programming language

  14. lo

    65 proposal VS lo

    💥 A Lodash-style Go library based on Go 1.18+ Generics (map, filter, contains, find...)

  15. RE2

    52 proposal VS RE2

    RE2 is a fast, safe, thread-friendly alternative to backtracking regular expression engines like those used in PCRE, Perl, and Python. It is a C++ library.

  16. GVM

    26 proposal VS GVM

    Go Version Manager

  17. thiserror

    derive(Error) for struct and enum error types

  18. go-generics-the-hard-way

    A hands-on approach to getting started with Go generics.

  19. Github-Ranking

    :star:Github Ranking:star: Github stars and forks ranking list. Github Top100 stars list of different languages. Automatically update daily. | Github仓库排名,每日自动更新

  20. functional-go

    This library is inspired by functional programming - Clojure

  21. go_chainable

    With generics, allowing chainable .Map(func(...)).Reduce(func(...)) syntax in go

  22. SaaSHub

    SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives

    SaaSHub logo
NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better proposal alternative or higher similarity.

proposal discussion

Log in or Post with

proposal reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of proposal. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2025-03-19.
  • The Defer Technical Specification: It Is Time
    2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 19 Mar 2025
    I know they implemented an optimization back in go 1.13. Not sure if that will help.

    https://github.com/golang/proposal/blob/master/design/34481-...

  • Lies we tell ourselves to keep using Golang
    16 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 26 Nov 2024
    the most basic example was the declined proposal https://github.com/golang/proposal/blob/master/design/32437-...

    Some people didn't like the "try" keyword it reminded them too much of exceptions, some people didn't like that they couldnt see a return inline (which was the purpose of the proposal in the first place).

    it's not that there are no solutions. the main problem is the go team's insistence to have "one true way" (tm) of doing something and unfortunately this gap between people who want to see every return inline and people who want to see the clean solution separate from the error handling is not something that can be bridged by technical means. the only solution is to implement both ways and lets see which one wins.

  • Does Go Have Subtyping?
    3 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 20 Oct 2023
    The conclusion is pretty weird to me.

    Go does rely on monomorphization for generics, just like C++ and Rust. The only difference is that this is an implementation detail, so Go can group multiple monomorphizations without worrying about anything else [1]. This form of hybrid monomorphization is being increasingly common, GHC does that and Rust is also trying to do so [2], so nothing special for Go here.

    On the other hand, explaining variance as a lifted polymorphism is---while not incorrect per se---also weird in part because a lack of variance is at worst just an annoyance. You can always make an adopter to unify heterogeneous types. Rust calls it `Box`, Go happens to call it an interface type instead. Both languages even do not allow heterogeneous concrete (or runtime) types in a single slice! So variance has no use in both languages because no concrete types are eligible for variance anyway.

    I think the conclusion got weird because the term "subtyping" is being misused. Subtyping, in the broadest sense, is just a non-trivial type relation. Many languages thus have a multiple notion of subtyping, often (almost) identical to each other but sometimes not. Go in particular has a lot of them, and even some relation like "T implements U" is a straightforward record subtyping. It is no surprise that the non-uniform value representation has the largest influence, and only monomorphization schemes and hetero-to-homogeneous adapters vary in this particular group.

    [1] https://github.com/golang/proposal/blob/master/design/generi...

    [2] https://rust-lang.github.io/compiler-team/working-groups/pol...

  • Backward Compatibility, Go 1.21, and Go 2
    6 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 14 Aug 2023
  • Defining interfaces in C++ with ‘concepts’ (C++20)
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 19 Apr 2023
    https://github.com/golang/proposal/blob/master/design/generi...
  • Why Turborepo is migrating from Go to Rust – Vercel
    7 projects | /r/golang | 8 Mar 2023
    Go Team wanted generics since the start. It was always a problem implementing them without severely hurting compile time and creating compilation bloat. Rust chose to ignore this problem, by relying on LLVM backend for optimizations and dead code elimination.
  • Are you a real programmer if you use VS Code? No Says OP in the byte sized drama
    1 project | /r/SubredditDrama | 24 Jan 2023
    Hold up, did the members actually push this forward or was support just often memed about and suddenly this proposal was made: https://github.com/golang/proposal/blob/master/design/43651-type-parameters.md
  • Major standard library changes in Go 1.20
    5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 16 Jan 2023
    As far as I can tell, the consensus for generics was "it will happen, but we really want to get this right, and it's taking time."

    I know some people did the knee-jerk attacks like "Go sucks, it should have had generics long ago" or "Go is fine, it doesn't need generics". I don't think we ever needed to take those attitudes seriously.

    > Will error handling be overhauled or not?

    Error handling is a thorny issue. It's the biggest complaint people have about Go, but I don't think that exceptions are obviously better, and the discriminated unions that power errors in Rust and some other languages are conspicuously absent from Go. So you end up with a bunch of different proposals for Go error handling that are either too radical or little more than syntactic sugar. The syntactic sugar proposals leave much to be desired. It looks like people are slowly grinding through these proposals until one is found with the right balance to it.

    I honestly don't know what kind of changes to error handling would appear in Go 2 if/when it lands, and I think the only reasonable answer right now is "wait and find out". You can see a more reasonable proposal here:

    https://github.com/golang/proposal/blob/master/design/go2dra...

    Characterizing it as a "lack of vision" does not seem fair here--I started using Rust back in the days when boxed pointers had ~ on them, and it seemed like it took Rust a lot of iterations to get to the current design. Which is fine. I am also never quite sure what is going to get added to future versions of C#.

    I am also not quite sure why Go gets so much hate on Hacker News--as far as I can tell, people have more or less given up on criticizing Java and C# (it's not like they've ossified), and C++ is enough of a dumpster fire that it seems gauche to point it out.

  • Go's Future v2 and Go's Versioning
    1 project | /r/golang | 25 Nov 2022
    There will almost certainly not be a Go 2 in that sense. There is a Go 2 transition doc which extensively discusses what "Go 2" means. The conclusion is
  • What's the status of the various "Go 2" proposals?
    2 projects | /r/golang | 15 Nov 2022
    As it says on that page - those were not proposals. They were draft ideas to get feedback on. You can see the list of proposals in this repository: https://github.com/golang/proposal
  • A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
    www.saashub.com | 20 Mar 2025
    SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →

Stats

Basic proposal repo stats
48
3,388
6.1
21 days ago

Sponsored
CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers
Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
coderabbit.ai

Did you know that HTML is
the 9th most popular programming language
based on number of references?