Lxml Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to lxml
-
xmltodict
Python module that makes working with XML feel like you are working with JSON
-
-
Activeloop.ai
Optimize your datasets for ML. Goodbye, boilerplate code - the fastest dataset optimization and management tool for computer vision.
-
html5lib
Standards-compliant library for parsing and serializing HTML documents and fragments in Python
-
-
selectolax
Python binding to Modest and Lexbor engines (fast HTML5 parser with CSS selectors).
-
bleach
Bleach is an allowed-list-based HTML sanitizing library that escapes or strips markup and attributes
-
-
Scout APM
Scout APM: A developer's best friend. Try free for 14-days. Scout APM uses tracing logic that ties bottlenecks to source code so you know the exact line of code causing performance issues and can get back to building a great product faster.
-
-
-
-
-
ale
Check syntax in Vim asynchronously and fix files, with Language Server Protocol (LSP) support
-
-
-
-
opencv-python
Automated CI toolchain to produce precompiled opencv-python, opencv-python-headless, opencv-contrib-python and opencv-contrib-python-headless packages.
-
-
-
maturin
Build and publish crates with pyo3, rust-cpython and cffi bindings as well as rust binaries as python packages
Reviews and mentions
-
How do i go about building a vidoe conferencing app?
Generally, I'm already using Python to glue together things like OpenCV or libxml, which do the heavy-lifting, and taking advantage of how things like Qt's QImage release Python's Global Interpreter Lock, allowing me to load and process images on a background thread, so the Python code itself is usually already I/O-bound, but yes. If the Python code would become a bottleneck, it helps with that too.
- Big brained meme I created
-
Catch some info with BeautifulSoup
BeautifulSoup doesn't support XPath, no? They would need to use a library like lxml instead.
-
Where to start: Learning Web-scraping
lxml is an XML parser however, it also supports HTML parsing. It's blazing fast and supports XPath. I think it isn't as beginner friendly to use, though it has detailed documentation. It works less well with heavily broken HTML documents and the encoding detection isn't as good as the one of BS4.
-
Python is better than C they said
According to lxml benchmarking docs, Python’s built in xml parser wouldn’t behave that bad either: https://github.com/lxml/lxml/blob/master/doc/performance.txt
-
Want to try automating what I do majority of the time for my job using Python. Help me check what's possible and recommend the better way to achieve this task.
*https://github.com/lxml/lxml *(works with beautifulsoup) as an internal parser
Stats
lxml/lxml is an open source project licensed under BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License which is an OSI approved license.
Popular Comparisons
Are you hiring? Post a new remote job listing for free.