Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR. Learn more →
Git Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to Git
-
-
CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
-
-
zig
General-purpose programming language and toolchain for maintaining robust, optimal, and reusable software.
-
-
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
rsync
An open source utility that provides fast incremental file transfer. It also has useful features for backup and restore operations among many other use cases.
-
-
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
NOTE:
The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives.
Hence, a higher number means a better Git alternative or higher similarity.
Git discussion
Git reviews and mentions
Posts with mentions or reviews of Git.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2025-01-16.
-
Why Git Subtree Requires Explicit Installation: Understanding Its Role and How It Becomes a Core Git Command
git clone https://github.com/git/git cd git/contrib/subtree
-
Oh Shit, Git?
Not trying to defend the choice of `git checkout` over `git switch` (and `git restore`) but they were introduced in v2.23 of Git [0], which was released about 5 years ago [1]. If you take a look at their help pages, they still include a warning that says
> THIS COMMAND IS EXPERIMENTAL. THE BEHAVIOR MAY CHANGE.
Granted, it has been in there for basically as long as the command(s) existed [2] and after 5 years perhaps it might be time to no longer call it experimental.
Still, it does seem like `git checkout` might be a bit more backwards compatible (and also reflective of the time when this website was originally created).
[0] https://github.com/git/git/blob/757161efcca150a9a96b312d9e78...
- Git v2.48.1 security fixes for CVE-2024-52006 and CVE-2024-50349
-
Debugging with git bisect: A Smarter Approach to Bug Localization
Github: bisect
-
How to create own Python project in 5 minutes
Tools used on this article: psp: repository -- docs git: repository -- docs docker: repository -- docs make: repository -- docs python: repository -- docs
-
My Hacktoberfest Journey: From First Pull Request to the Hall of Fame
GIT Version Control System
-
Open source, learn in public e minha experiência
O sistema de versionamento de código mais utilizado, git
-
5 open-source tools every developer should know
Git
-
Why some of us like "interdiff" code review systems (not GitHub)
> Because it was under 1000 layers of other bullshit
Not only because of that.
git-range-diff, while absolutely a killer feature, is a relatively new feature of git as well (a bit similarly to "git rebase --update-refs" -- which I've just learned of from you <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41511241>, so thanks for that :)).
Namely, git-range-diff existed out-of-tree as "git tbdiff" <https://github.com/trast/tbdiff> originally. It was ported to git proper in August 2018 <https://github.com/git/git/commit/d9c66f0b5bfd>; so it's not a feature people could have used "15 years ago".
(FWIW, before git-range-diff was a thing, and also before I had learned about git-tbdiff, I had developed a silly little script for myself, for doing nearly the same. Several other people did the same for themselves, too. Incremental review was vital for most serious maintainers, so it was a no-brainer to run "git format-patch" on two versions of a series, and colordiff those. The same workflow is essential for comparing a backport to the original (upstream) version of the series. Of course my stupid little script couldn't recognize reorderings of patches, or a subject line rewrite while the patch body stayed mostly the same.)
- Shell.how: Explain Shell Commands
-
A note from our sponsor - CodeRabbit
coderabbit.ai | 9 Feb 2025
Stats
Basic Git repo stats
301
53,425
10.0
4 days ago
git/git is an open source project licensed under GNU General Public License v3.0 or later which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of Git is C.
Sponsored
CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers
Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.
coderabbit.ai
Review ★★★★★ 10/10
My development process is sometimes really sloppy. I rely so heavily on git to keep me on track and it does a great job.
Review ★★★★★ 10/10
Review ★★★★★ 10/10