SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →
Gitlab Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to gitlab
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
-
terraform
Terraform enables you to safely and predictably create, change, and improve infrastructure. It is a source-available tool that codifies APIs into declarative configuration files that can be shared amongst team members, treated as code, edited, reviewed, and versioned.
-
-
-
Git
Git Source Code Mirror - This is a publish-only repository but pull requests can be turned into patches to the mailing list via GitGitGadget (https://gitgitgadget.github.io/). Please follow Documentation/SubmittingPatches procedure for any of your improvements.
-
Gitea
Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD
-
-
-
-
-
-
gitness
Discontinued Harness Open Source is an end-to-end developer platform with Source Control Management, CI/CD Pipelines, Hosted Developer Environments, and Artifact Registries. [Moved to: https://github.com/harness/harness]
-
-
NOTE:
The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives.
Hence, a higher number means a better gitlab alternative or higher similarity.
gitlab discussion
gitlab reviews and mentions
Posts with mentions or reviews of gitlab.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-09-11.
-
Gitlab patches bug that could expose a CI/CD pipeline to supply chain attack
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/compare/v17.1.6-ee......
The merge commit with calling out environment stop actions:
- Automate Uploading Security Scan Results to DefectDojo
-
We Spent $20 to Achieve RCE and Accidentally Became the Admins of .MOBI
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/327121 is the first one, and I'm having trouble locating up the second (possibly due to the search pollution from the first one) but there are a bunch of "Exiftool has been updated to version [0-9.]+ in order to mitigate security issues" style lines in their security releases feed so it's possible they were bitten by upstream Exiftool CVEs
Anyway, turns out that shelling out to an external binary fed with bytes from the Internet is good fun
-
Going open-source as a VC-Backed company
I'm not sure I personally agree with this, and I'm not 100% sure the developer community at-large does either...
Let's take a few examples, which I've shared elsewhere in similar discussions:
- GitLab: Open Source or Open Core? Most would say Open Source, but (I assume) you would argue Open Core [0].
- Plausible: Open Source or Open Core? They say Open Source, but it's actually Open Core [1].
- Cal.com: Open Source or Open Core? They say Open Source, but once again, Open Core [2].
- Posthog: Open Source or Open Core? They say Open Source, still Open Core [3].
- Sidekiq: Open Source or Open Core? Once again: Open Core [4].
Yet, every dev I know would consider these projects Open Source. So there's a disconnect somewhere.
Under this mindset, very few open source startups are actually open source, yet everybody says they are?
I'm not trying to argue either way; I'm trying to point out a disconnect here.
[0]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/master/ee/LICENS...
[1]: https://github.com/plausible/analytics/blob/2dd2f058d1dcae6f...
[2]: https://github.com/calcom/cal.com/blob/main/packages/feature...
[3]: https://github.com/PostHog/posthog/blob/master/ee/LICENSE
[4]: https://github.com/sidekiq/sidekiq/blob/main/COMM-LICENSE.tx...
-
Anyone Can Access Deleted and Private Repository Data on GitHub
The article is singling out GitHub in the title and for most of the article, only in the very last line they declare that this behavior is a common design flow and not limited to GitHub:
> Finally, while our research focused on GitHub, it’s important to note that some of these issues exist on other version control system products
For example, Gitlab only recently solved this: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/408137
Also, I don't appreciate the fearmongering. Multiple times they repeated statements like how you can "Access Private Repo Data" when it's a rather special case related to forks. They clarify that later but I found these statements repeated in that fashion, whether intentionally or not, very cheap. Especially for a tech blog, where the material itself is good and could stand on its own.
-
Gitlab python-based job to remove stale branches
However, it's not possible to do a bulk removal or have a more sophisticated control of these branches.
-
Easy response caching for Grape API
Gitlab 1 2 3 4
-
Gitlab Duo
Since the relevant code appears to be in the "ee" directory <https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/v16.11.0-ee/ee/l...> and is not present in the foss repo, I'm guessing the answer is no, at least for now. They do have a history of "releasing" features from EE back to CE but my suspicion is not for LLM stuff
- Code Search Is Hard
- XZ Backdoor Investigation Request to Gitlab Team
-
A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
www.saashub.com | 4 Oct 2024
Stats
Basic gitlab repo stats
455
-
-
-
Sponsored
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com