Your projects are multi-language. So is SonarQube analysis. Find Bugs, Vulnerabilities, Security Hotspots, and Code Smells so you can release quality code every time. Get started analyzing your projects today for free. Learn more →
Gitlab Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to gitlab
-
Gitea
Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD
-
SonarQube
Static code analysis for 29 languages.. Your projects are multi-language. So is SonarQube analysis. Find Bugs, Vulnerabilities, Security Hotspots, and Code Smells so you can release quality code every time. Get started analyzing your projects today for free.
-
-
-
-
Mergify
Updating dependencies is time-consuming.. Solutions like Dependabot or Renovate update but don't merge dependencies. You need to do it manually while it could be fully automated! Add a Merge Queue to your workflow and stop caring about PR management & merging. Try Mergify for free.
-
gitness
Gitness is an Open Source developer platform with Source Control management, Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery.
-
Harbor
An open source trusted cloud native registry project that stores, signs, and scans content.
-
rich-markdown-editor
The open source React and Prosemirror based markdown editor that powers Outline. Want to try it out? Create an account:
-
-
Git
Git Source Code Mirror - This is a publish-only repository but pull requests can be turned into patches to the mailing list via GitGitGadget (https://gitgitgadget.github.io/). Please follow Documentation/SubmittingPatches procedure for any of your improvements.
-
-
-
-
chatwoot
Open-source customer engagement suite, an alternative to Intercom, Zendesk, Salesforce Service Cloud etc. 🔥💬
-
terraform
Terraform enables you to safely and predictably create, change, and improve infrastructure. It is a source-available tool that codifies APIs into declarative configuration files that can be shared amongst team members, treated as code, edited, reviewed, and versioned.
-
-
-
InfluxDB
Collect and Analyze Billions of Data Points in Real Time. Manage all types of time series data in a single, purpose-built database. Run at any scale in any environment in the cloud, on-premises, or at the edge.
gitlab reviews and mentions
- Harness launches Gitness, an open-source GitHub competitor
-
Gitlab Critical Security Release: 16.3.4 and 16.2.7
GitLab team member here. Thanks for your feedback.
> Request: The new UI has "Admin" link hidden which is hard to find. I liked the old UI better (explicit is better than implicit).
This was reported in the new navigation feedback issue [0] and is being worked on in [1]. Suggest adding your comment/upvote there too.
> Question: Is the open source code the same as the Enterprise versions of the code? (how do you implement feature differences?)
The source code for GitLab is located in a single repository. The change was proposed and introduced in 2019 for efficiency reasons [2] [3] [4]
You can learn more about the stewardship of GitLab, and the promises in [5] - section 11 links to the enterprise code location, and the free open source location.
This workflow also ensures that everyone can contribute to GitLab [6] - free users, and customers [7], using the same code base.
[0] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/409005#what-we...
[1] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/415854
[2] https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2019/02/21/merging-ce-and-ee-c...
[3] https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2019/08/23/a-single-codebase-f...
[4] https://about.gitlab.com/blog/2019/10/02/contributor-after-s...
[5] https://handbook.gitlab.com/handbook/company/stewardship/#pr...
[6] https://about.gitlab.com/community/contribute/
[7] https://docs.gitlab.com/ee/development/contributing/#contrib...
Thanks for your feedback.
Requests are triaged using automation and AI, and responsible teams include the reviews in their planning. [0]
Issues (and related MRs) are targeting milestones. Since we work in iterations and smaller changes to release features faster, epics help plan and group the issues. Roadmaps and boards are used by product managers, too. [1] [2] Example roadmap filtered by the CI section [3]
Every stage, group, feature has labels applied, which allows the creation of specific filters. For example, "Category:Code Suggestions" as label filter [4]
Additional helpers are available in the handbook, for example the "Features by group" overview [5] which shows the feature maintainers in the section, stage, group, product and engineering managers, etc.
Customers can open support tickets, too. [6] Opening a public issue is encouraged so other community members can engage and collaborate. Often, a workaround or fast solution is unveiled because of collaboration and transparency.
When in doubt whether it is a bug or feature, or asking for (troubleshooting) help, you are welcome to join our community forum or Discord. [7] I'm mostly active on the forum myself. [8]
[0] https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/engineering/quality/issue-...
[1] https://about.gitlab.com/direction/#how-we-plan-releases
[2] https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/product-processes/...
[3] https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/roadmap?state=opened&...
[4] https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/?label_name%5B...
[5] https://about.gitlab.com/handbook/product/categories/feature...
[6] https://about.gitlab.com/support/
-
Gitlab's plan to support ActivityPub for merge requests
Fun, but as a GitLab user I’d much rather they address missing features of their core competency (code review), like the inability to “request changes” or otherwise block a merge (https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/761, issue open 6 years), or adding the ability to both squash and merge AND use the merge train
I know companies are big organizations that can do more than one thing at a time, but we were just burned again recently by the inability to block a merge, and so I’m salty
-
HashiCorp Adopts Business Source License
IANAL but I believe this change applies only to Hashicorp source code and not API compatible endpoints. So, had (and for clarity, they for sure did not) GitLab used terraform source code to implement such a state provider, yes, they'd run afoul and have to fork or relinquish their license of the source
But similar to the GitLab Sentry backend API (e.g. https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/v15.0.0-ee/lib/a... ) the Terraform state endpoints are also in Rails, just like all the rest of the Internet facing GitLab API: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/v15.0.0-ee/lib/a...
-
CodeCov is now Open Source
You are misinformed; they implemented a Sentry-compatible endpoint if the Project enabled it: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/blob/v15.0.0-ee/lib/a...
I feel perhaps you meant to link to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/329596 which describes their intention to accept Sentry formatted JSON payloads and store them in their own database. Searching for "no need" in that issue will highlight the number of times they were drawing a distinction between the effort required to run GitLab and the effort to run the 15 containers of Sentry self-hosted
-
Super sorry to the guy with the username reset on GitHub
There's a similar issue on gitlab : https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/255108.
-
Beautifying our UI: Giving Gitlab build features a fresh look
all I want, is the number of contributions in the last year, like GitHub has:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/22578
its just one number, I just wish they could add this one little thing so I could move away from GitHub once and for all. even CodeBerg has it:
FWIW, they had said that they didn't write it originally and had found it "somewhere on the Internet". Searching for "pid: .pipeline.id, tid: .id, ts" has turned up this, which might be the original source:
GitLab team member here. Thanks for the feedback.
The picture in the blog post needs an update. I just checked a running pipeline that shows the green `latest` label. Added a screenshot of the pipeline, and the update suggestions for our teams into https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/414756#note_14...
-
A note from our sponsor - SonarQube
www.sonarqube.org | 24 Sep 2023