zeitgeist VS quacc

I received a similar question in the last AMA. I'm going to copy and paste my answer from there.. ...there are quite a few projects which are a bit different or are C2C focused, even aside from the ones you mentioned (e.g. Subsocial). For example,Totem Accounting's KAPEX parachain which allows for on-chain recorded accounting. Robonomics allows you to control real-world hardware via its parachain (I've taken a few pictures of different nebulae and minted NFTs from them by controlling a telescope via Robonomics Network). Zeitgeist is developing prediction markets. Of course, if you still see a hole in the market, we'd be happy if you want to build it. We have several different funding sources to help you do so.

However, there are quite a few projects which are a bit different or are C2C focused, even aside from the ones you mentioned (e.g. Subsocial). For example, Totem Accounting's KAPEX parachain which allows for on-chain recorded accounting. Robonomics allows you to control real-world hardware via its parachain (I've taken a few pictures of different nebulae and minted NFTs from them by controlling a telescope via Robonomics Network). Zeitgeist is developing prediction markets.

I met someone from Zeitgeist, a company that builds a para-chain in the Polkadot ecosystem for prediction markets.

Zeitgeist - Logan

As far as we are aware, Zeitgeist and Basilisk are still shipping quality code. We've looked into Zeitgeist latest update (20 hours ago) and it seems that they are getting ready for reward distributions due to the inclusion of the rewards pallet version 0.6.0

Kind of a side note, I tried doing something like this for the various Bitcoin forks and a couple other popular cryptocurrencies back in 2018 (see the QuACC - Quality Analysis of Cryptocurrency Codebases) repo if you are interested, although it's very out of date now). It turns out that it's not entirely straightforward to determine programmatically how secure code is.