quacc
Crypto quality (by laboon)
openbrush-contracts
By Supercolony-net
quacc | openbrush-contracts | |
---|---|---|
1 | 2 | |
1 | 109 | |
- | 0.0% | |
10.0 | 0.6 | |
over 5 years ago | about 1 year ago | |
Shell | Rust | |
MIT License | MIT License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
quacc
Posts with mentions or reviews of quacc.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-08-19.
-
Bill Laboon AMA - 19 Aug 13.00 - 14.00 UTC
Kind of a side note, I tried doing something like this for the various Bitcoin forks and a couple other popular cryptocurrencies back in 2018 (see the QuACC - Quality Analysis of Cryptocurrency Codebases) repo if you are interested, although it's very out of date now). It turns out that it's not entirely straightforward to determine programmatically how secure code is.
openbrush-contracts
Posts with mentions or reviews of openbrush-contracts.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-08-19.
-
Bill Laboon AMA - 19 Aug 13.00 - 14.00 UTC
There have definitely been some challenges in improving the performance of Wasm smart contracts. These have all seemed like engineering challenges to me, not basic theoretical roadblocks. You have to remember that Solidity/EVM and its tools have been around for years, while Wasm smart contracts and the surrounding ecosystem are still really in their infancy, although there are teams helping to build more tools for it (e.g. https://medium.com/astar-network/swanky-the-all-in-one-wasm-tool-50c0ed9f07a6, https://openbrush.io/) .
- WASM conference now in progress
What are some alternatives?
When comparing quacc and openbrush-contracts you can also consider the following projects:
gossamer - 🕸️ Go Implementation of the Polkadot Host
kagome - Kagome - C++20 implementation of Polkadot Host
zeitgeist - An evolving blockchain for prediction markets and futarchy.