paperclip
WIP OpenAPI tooling for Rust. [Moved to: https://github.com/paperclip-rs/paperclip] (by wafflespeanut)
fastapi
FastAPI framework, high performance, easy to learn, fast to code, ready for production (by tiangolo)
paperclip | fastapi | |
---|---|---|
3 | 467 | |
428 | 71,023 | |
- | - | |
6.0 | 9.8 | |
over 2 years ago | 4 days ago | |
Rust | Python | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
paperclip
Posts with mentions or reviews of paperclip.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-01-12.
-
Replacing FastAPI with Rust: Part 3 - Trying Actix
The first bit I tried was following pieces of the official actix-web tutorial in order to get a tiny little web server started locally. This went fine, but was actually a big mistake as that tutorial teaches you to use macros to define endpoints which, at the time of writing, Paperclip does not support.
-
Replacing FastAPI with Rust: Part 2 - Research
The biggest issue with Paperclip is that it only currently supports OpenAPI v2. There is work in progress to add v3 support, but it's just that: in progress. This means that if I really want to supplant FastAPI with this actix-web w/ Paperclip combo, I'm going to have to write my own v3 implementation. There is a GitHub Issue which talks about the intended strategy for achieving this being somehow based on converting a v2 spec to v3. I'm not sure how possible this will be considering there are some important features missing from v2. It makes more sense to me for this to be a different feature via cargo flag (or at least a different module).
fastapi
Posts with mentions or reviews of fastapi.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-04-26.
-
FastAPI Best Practices: A Condensed Guide with Examples
FastAPI is a modern, high-performance web framework for building APIs with Python, based on standard Python type hints.
-
Building an Email Assistant Application with Burr
In this tutorial, I will demonstrate how to use Burr, an open source framework (disclosure: I helped create it), using simple OpenAI client calls to GPT4, and FastAPI to create a custom email assistant agent. We’ll describe the challenge one faces and then how you can solve for them. For the application frontend we provide a reference implementation but won’t dive into details for it.
-
FastAPI Got Me an OpenAPI Spec Really... Fast
That’s when I found FastAPI.
-
How to Deploy a Fast API Application to a Kubernetes Cluster using Podman and Minikube
FastAPI & Uvicorn
-
Analysing FastAPI Middleware Performance
Discussion at FastAPI GitHub: https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/issues/2696
-
LangChain, Python, and Heroku
An API application framework (such as FastAPI)
-
Litestar – powerful, flexible, and highly performant Python ASGI framework
It’s been my experience that async Python frameworks tend to turn IO bound problems into CPU bound problems with a high enough request rate, because due to their nature they act as unbounded queues.
This ends up made worse if you’re using sync routes.
If you’re constrained on a resource such as a database connection pool, your framework will continue to pull http requests off the wire that a sane client will cancel and retry due to timeouts because it takes too long to get a connection out of the pool. Since there isn’t a straightforward way to cancel the execution of a route handler in every Python http framework I’ve seen exhibit this problem, the problem quickly snowballs.
This is an issue with fastapi, too- https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/issues/5759
-
AI-Powered Image Search with CLIP, pgvector, and Fast API
Fast API.
- Ask HN: What is your go-to stack for the web?
-
Fun with Avatars: Crafting the core engine | Part. 1
We will create our API using FastAPI, a modern high-performance web framework for building fast APIs with Python. It is designed to be easy to use, efficient, and highly scalable. Some key features of FastAPI include: