utoipa
upx
utoipa | upx | |
---|---|---|
15 | 30 | |
1,892 | 13,514 | |
- | 2.0% | |
8.1 | 9.5 | |
6 days ago | 6 days ago | |
Rust | C++ | |
Apache License 2.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
utoipa
-
What's everyone working on this week (23/2023)?
In case you didn't know https://github.com/juhaku/utoipa is really nice to generate openapi spec and have a swagger!
-
OpenAPI v4 Proposal
play-swagger [2] for scala + play. They generate a significant portion of your spec for you, then a client can be generated from the spec.
[1] https://github.com/juhaku/utoipa
[2] https://github.com/iheartradio/play-swagger
-
REST API in RUST with ntex
utoipa
-
Announcing utoipa 3.0.0, one year anniversary release - Compile time OpenAPI library for Rust
Latest release notes: https://github.com/juhaku/utoipa/releases/tag/utoipa-3.0.0
- New Tokio blog post: Announcing axum 0.6.0
-
Using Rust at a Startup: A Cautionary Tale
I've written a few backend APIs with rust and I have to disagree. Not only have the frameworks managed to get the ergonomics similar to your popular GC lang[0][1], the natural lack of shared mutable state of HTTP handlers means you very rarely have to encounter lifetimes and a lot of the language's advanced features. What's more, now when I go back to work with other languages, I can't help but notice the significant number of unit tests I'd not have had to write in Rust. It doesn't have a Rails and Django but it's an easy pick over anything at the language level.
A note on performance, Rust's the only langauge where I haven't had the need to update my unit test harnesses to `TRUNCATE` data base data instead of creating a separate db per test on PostgresSQL.
I'll also like to mention the gem that is SQLx[1]. As someone who's never been satisfied with ORMs, type checked SQL queries that auto-populate your custom types is revolutionary. With the error-prone langauge-SQL boundary covered, I was surprised just how good it can get making use of the builtin PostgreSQL features. Almost to the point that amount of effort the community's put to building great tools like Prisma.js and feel like a fool's errand (at least so for PosgreSQL).
[0]: https://github.com/alexpusch/rust-magic-function-params
[1]: https://github.com/juhaku/utoipa
[3]: lib.rs/crates/sqlx
-
Book Review: Zero To Production In Rust
Going to strongly disagree here. This isn't necessary in most cases. You likely do not need to test actix-web. actix-web already has more tests than you can possibly think of for exercising its correctness. So why do you need to black-box test it? Further, if your concern is an API client integrating with the API, use code generation not tests to ensure correctness! Generate your clients from a spec generated from your types! I recommend Swagger/OpenAPI or JSON Schema. Here's a nice library for doing this: https://github.com/juhaku/utoipa
-
Web frameworks with integrated Open API?
utoipa: supports most popular frameworks
-
Announcing utoipa 2.0.0, long awaited release - Compile time OpenAPI + Swagger UI
Something like that is planned in future releases. There is a closed discussion in Github https://github.com/juhaku/utoipa/issues/201 and traits for this already exists but the derive implementaiton is yet to be done.
-
okapi-operation - procedural macro for generating OpenAPI operation definitions
Those tags next function parameters look cool. Do you maybe know a crate Utoipa and could share differences between the two crates for those who want to quickly compare them? I've been using utoipa but also I've been following the discussion on Axum's repo about OpenAPI integration in hope for something more comfortable to write. Taking a quick peek they seem very similar but I'm guessing the approach is slightly different?
upx
-
PicoCTF 2024: packer
According to this source:
-
The Trade-Offs of Optimizing and Compressing Go Binaries
Following optimization, tools like UPX can compress the resulting binary, significantly reducing file size. This compression is invaluable for resource-constrained environments but adds a decompression step during binary execution.
- Tradutor Automático de legendas
-
Obfuscation & Executable Compression in Go
I have been using UPX but I'm quite sure if there's something out there that offers better compression.
-
My website is one binary
Ah that's nice, long ago I used parchment.js to load a inform7 created z5 file on my website. You could try to compress your executable with upx https://upx.github.io/
-
Bypassing Windows Defender (10 Ways)
In this process, the given packer tool embeds a natively compiled PE into another executable that contains the information needed to unpack the original content and execute it. Perhaps the most well known packer, which is not even for malicious purposes, is Golang's UPX package.
-
How do you guys deal with protecting source code for your game when launch into steam or mobile platform?
Rewrite in C#, and use an obfuscator on the DLL. You can also write some parts in C++ as many variable and function names are forgotten when compiling. You should also encrypt the PCK, and see if you can embed it. If it's embedded, you can make it more annoying to deal with by packing it with https://upx.github.io/
-
Encrypted file in OneDrive Personal Vault Detected as Ransomware.
Another good example of false positives like this would be binaries that are compressed with UPX - the way it works is apparently very similar to how stub-loader malware operates and signature detection tools will flag it as malicious.
-
REST API in RUST with ntex
This will optimise the release binary to be as small as possible. Additionally with upx we can create really small docker image !
-
help packing sound in <4k
Then I compressed it with upx, cp small.exe smallUpx.exe && upx --brute smallUpx.exe, got a 10752 bytes executable, half the size, but still pretty large
What are some alternatives?
swagger-ui - Swagger UI is a collection of HTML, JavaScript, and CSS assets that dynamically generate beautiful documentation from a Swagger-compliant API.
rust - Empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.
swagger-core - Examples and server integrations for generating the Swagger API Specification, which enables easy access to your REST API
rust-sdl2 - SDL2 bindings for Rust
axum - Ergonomic and modular web framework built with Tokio, Tower, and Hyper
legion - High performance Rust ECS library
socketioxide - A socket.io server implementation in Rust that integrates with the Tower ecosystem and the Tokio stack.
Lean and Mean Docker containers - Slim(toolkit): Don't change anything in your container image and minify it by up to 30x (and for compiled languages even more) making it secure too! (free and open source)
oaph - Helps to subtituate query params and schema definitions to openapi3/asyncapi yaml.
distroless - 🥑 Language focused docker images, minus the operating system.
oatx - Generator-less JSONSchema types straight from OpenAPI spec
fpm - Effing package management! Build packages for multiple platforms (deb, rpm, etc) with great ease and sanity.