typedload
json_benchmark
typedload | json_benchmark | |
---|---|---|
5 | 2 | |
254 | 20 | |
- | - | |
8.1 | 3.7 | |
7 days ago | 8 months ago | |
Python | Python | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
typedload
-
Show HN: Up to 100x Faster FastAPI with simdjson and io_uring on Linux 5.19
Author of typedload here!
FastAPI relies on (not so fast) pydantic, which is one of the slowest libraries in that category.
Don't expect to find such benchmarks on the pydantic documentation itself, but the competing libraries will have them.
[0] https://ltworf.github.io/typedload/
-
Pydantic vs Protobuf vs Namedtuples vs Dataclasses
I wrote typedload, which is significantly faster than pydantic. Just uses normal dataclasses/attrs/NamedTuple, has a better API and is pure Python!
- Informatica serve a qualcosa?
-
Show HN: Python framework is faster than Golang Fiber
I read all the perftests in the repo. I think they nearly all parse a structure that contains a repetition of the same or similar thing a couple hundred thousand times times and the timing function returns the min and max of 5 attempts. I just picked one example for posting.
Not a Python expert, but could the Pydantic tests be possibly not realistic and/or misleading because they are using kwargs in __init__ [1] to parse the object instead of calling the parse_obj class method [2]? According to some PEPs [3], isn't Python creating a new dictionary for that parameter which would be included in the timing? That would be unfortunate if that accounted for the difference.
Something else I think about is if a performance test doesn't produce a side effect that is checked, a smart compiler or runtime could optimize the whole benchmark away. Or too easy for the CPU to do branch prediction, etc. I think I recall that happening to me in Java in the past, but probably not happened here in Python.
[1] https://github.com/ltworf/typedload/blob/37c72837e0a8fd5f350...
[2] https://docs.pydantic.dev/usage/models/#helper-functions
[3] https://peps.python.org/pep-0692/
json_benchmark
-
Show HN: Up to 100x Faster FastAPI with simdjson and io_uring on Linux 5.19
If you're primarily targeting Python as an application layer, you may also want to check out my msgspec library[1]. All the perf benefits of e.g. yyjson, but with schema validation like pydantic. It regularly benchmarks[2] as the fastest JSON library for Python. Much of the overhead of decoding JSON -> Python comes from the python layer, and msgspec employs every trick I know to minimize that overhead.
[1]: https://github.com/jcrist/msgspec
[2]: https://github.com/TkTech/json_benchmark
-
Sunday Daily Thread: What's everyone working on this week?
- Adding nvme drive support to SMARTie, https://github.com/tktech/smartie, which is a pure-python cross-platform library for getting disk information like serial number, SMART attributes (like disk temperature) - json_benchmark, https://github.com/tktech/json_benchmark, which is a new benchmark and correctness test for the more modern Python JSON libraries - py_yyjson, https://github.com/tktech/py_yyjson, which is still a WIP and provides Python bindings to the yyjson library, which offers comparable speed to simdjson but more flexibility when parsing (comments, arbitrary sized numbers, Inf/Nan, etc) - And some fixes to https://github.com/TkTech/humanmark, which is a markdown library used to edit the README.md in json_benchmark above.
What are some alternatives?
codon - A high-performance, zero-overhead, extensible Python compiler using LLVM
japronto - Screaming-fast Python 3.5+ HTTP toolkit integrated with pipelining HTTP server based on uvloop and picohttpparser.
ustore - Multi-Modal Database replacing MongoDB, Neo4J, and Elastic with 1 faster ACID solution, with NetworkX and Pandas interfaces, and bindings for C 99, C++ 17, Python 3, Java, GoLang 🗄️
data-analysis
pydantic-core - Core validation logic for pydantic written in rust
search-dw - search-dw is a Python utility to automate "search and download" via the command line. It might be useful if you need to download the results of a Google search for a certain type of topic at the same time
peps - Python Enhancement Proposals
json-buffet
msgspec - A fast serialization and validation library, with builtin support for JSON, MessagePack, YAML, and TOML
is2 - embedded RESTy http(s) server library from Edgio
koda-validate - Typesafe, Composable Validation
jsplit - A Go program to split large JSON files into many jsonl files