SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →
Typedload Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to typedload
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
simdjson
Parsing gigabytes of JSON per second : used by Facebook/Meta Velox, the Node.js runtime, ClickHouse, WatermelonDB, Apache Doris, Milvus, StarRocks
-
msgspec
A fast serialization and validation library, with builtin support for JSON, MessagePack, YAML, and TOML
-
zsv
zsv+lib: world's fastest (simd) CSV parser, bare metal or wasm, with an extensible CLI for SQL querying, format conversion and more
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
-
ustore
Multi-Modal Database replacing MongoDB, Neo4J, and Elastic with 1 faster ACID solution, with NetworkX and Pandas interfaces, and bindings for C 99, C++ 17, Python 3, Java, GoLang 🗄️
-
ucall
Remote Procedure Calls - 50x lower latency and 70x higher bandwidth than FastAPI, implementing JSON-RPC & 🔜 REST over io_uring and SIMDJSON ☎️
-
japronto
Screaming-fast Python 3.5+ HTTP toolkit integrated with pipelining HTTP server based on uvloop and picohttpparser.
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
typedload reviews and mentions
-
Show HN: Up to 100x Faster FastAPI with simdjson and io_uring on Linux 5.19
Author of typedload here!
FastAPI relies on (not so fast) pydantic, which is one of the slowest libraries in that category.
Don't expect to find such benchmarks on the pydantic documentation itself, but the competing libraries will have them.
-
Pydantic vs Protobuf vs Namedtuples vs Dataclasses
I wrote typedload, which is significantly faster than pydantic. Just uses normal dataclasses/attrs/NamedTuple, has a better API and is pure Python!
- Informatica serve a qualcosa?
-
Show HN: Python framework is faster than Golang Fiber
I read all the perftests in the repo. I think they nearly all parse a structure that contains a repetition of the same or similar thing a couple hundred thousand times times and the timing function returns the min and max of 5 attempts. I just picked one example for posting.
Not a Python expert, but could the Pydantic tests be possibly not realistic and/or misleading because they are using kwargs in __init__ [1] to parse the object instead of calling the parse_obj class method [2]? According to some PEPs [3], isn't Python creating a new dictionary for that parameter which would be included in the timing? That would be unfortunate if that accounted for the difference.
Something else I think about is if a performance test doesn't produce a side effect that is checked, a smart compiler or runtime could optimize the whole benchmark away. Or too easy for the CPU to do branch prediction, etc. I think I recall that happening to me in Java in the past, but probably not happened here in Python.
[1] https://github.com/ltworf/typedload/blob/37c72837e0a8fd5f350...
[2] https://docs.pydantic.dev/usage/models/#helper-functions
-
A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
www.saashub.com | 19 Apr 2024
Stats
ltworf/typedload is an open source project licensed under GNU General Public License v3.0 or later which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of typedload is Python.