staticvec VS rust

This crate of mine for example is currently literally unusable until the deeply fundamental features that John Random kinda-sorta removed in this pull request, ostensibly in preparation for whatever shittily stated syntax is ultimately establihed by whatever the hell "keyword generics" actually is (I really don't know, like this isn't a joke, I fundamentally do not understand what the fuck they're proposing at all in any way or how it's meaningfully and usefullly different from the previous syntax).

If you're on nightly, I have a crate that I'd say would seem to be exactly what you're looking for.

I'd say the module system can sometimes get in the way of even the most technically well-documented crate out there. It's why for example I carefully rexport the various types implemented by my crate StaticVec from lib.rs such that the main docs page looks like this, even though "under the hood" everything is actually about as modular as you might expect it to be.

Here.

Your link there is rather outdated. mem::unitialized() is deprecated and not recommended for use. MaybeUninit works more than fine in my experience, anyways.

The lack of decltype-esque functionality has consequences that are far-reaching enough to be worthy of more than a throwaway mention, IMO. See this ongoing issue for a crate of mine, for example.

If you're on nightly, my crate StaticVec definitely has your use case covered and then some.

Looks like this crate uses the full const_generics instead of min_const_generics (see here), along with a couple dozen other unstable features. I'm not sure how much of that could easily be removed, since it is often the tendency to enable tons of unstable features when you are already on nightly because of something like const generics.

Here's an example of someone citing a disagreement between CRT and shell32:

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44650

This in addition to the Rust CVE mentioned elsewhere in the thread which was rooted in this issue:

https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/04/09/cve-2024-24576.html

Here are some quick programs to test contrasting approaches. I don't have examples of inputs where they parse differently on hand right now, but I know they exist. This was also a problem that was frequently discussed internally when I worked at MSFT.

    #include 

> instead of choosing a certain numbered version of the random library (if I remember correctly) I let cargo download the latest version which had a completely different API.

Yeah, they didn't follow the instructions and got burned. I still think that multiple things went wrong simultaneously for that experience. I wonder if more prevalent uses of `#[doc(alias = "name")]` being leveraged by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120730 (which now that I check only accounts for methods and not functions, I should get on that!) so that when changing APIs around people at least get a slightly better experience.

Almost fixed the compiler: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123325

Rust: A secure, efficient, and modern programming language (omitting ten thousand words). You can simply follow the installation instructions provided on the official website.

Recently did something similar in Rust but for generating SVGs. We've adopted it for snapshot testing of cargo and rustc's output. Don't have a good PR handy for showing Github's rendering of changes in the SVG (text, side-by-side, swiping) but https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121877/files has newly added SVGs.

To see what is supported, see the screenshot in the docs: https://docs.rs/anstyle-svg/latest/anstyle_svg/

We strongly believe in Rust as a powerful language for building production-grade software, especially for systems like ours that run alongside Kubernetes.

The above Assert<{N % 2 == 1}> requires #![feature(generic_const_exprs)] and the nightly toolchain. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76560 for more info.