standard
SimpleCov
standard | SimpleCov | |
---|---|---|
18 | 11 | |
2,592 | 4,708 | |
0.5% | 0.1% | |
8.0 | 6.6 | |
10 days ago | 3 days ago | |
Ruby | Ruby | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
standard
-
Am I the only one who doesn't put parentheses around the parameters in Ruby method definitions?
Rubocop has a default rule that says to put parentheses when there are parameters; even Standardrb has a default ([https://github.com/standardrb/standard/blob/8307fa8f449f896075ccad 74bf6a128ed2c26189/config/base.yml#L1098:title])
- Standardrb: Ruby's bikeshed-proof linter and formatter
-
Must-have gems for mature Rails
gem "rubocop" - https://github.com/rubocop/rubocop | Set up code guidelines for your dev team, I recommend using whatever Standard recommends.
-
A Writer's Ruby
Cynically, reading heavily between the lines, this reads to me like DHH just found out lots of rubyists like standardrb. https://github.com/standardrb/standard -- and this is his quick reaction to it.
-
"Useless Ruby sugar": Endless (one-line) methods
This is a huge reason why I still use StandardJS and—shifting back to Ruby—why I rejected the countless requests for implementing line-length or any other metrics analysis rules for [StandardRB](https://github.com/standardrb/standard). There is always a legitimate edge case when it comes to length of lines and functions and the alternative—chopping them off arbitrarily—is rarely an improvement.
-
An Introduction to RuboCop for Ruby on Rails
This approach is known as Standard Ruby. It can also be completed with plugins, including one for Ruby on Rails projects.
-
It's Official: the Standard Ruby VS Code extension
Oh, this is fantastic! Would you be willing to send a quick PR to our README?
-
Rails vs Rubocop?
[0] https://github.com/testdouble/standard
-
Linting and Auto-formatting Ruby Code With RuboCop
If you don't want to fiddle with configuration files and the wealth of options provided by RuboCop, consider taking a look at the Standard project. It's largely a pre-configured version of RuboCop that aims to enforce a consistent style in your Ruby project without allowing the customization of any of its rules. The lightning talk where it was first announced gives more details about its origin and motivations.
- Utilizando o padrĂŁo interactor no Ruby on Rails
SimpleCov
-
Must-have gems for mature Rails
gem "simplecov" - https://github.com/simplecov-ruby/simplecov | Gather spec coverage stats locally and on CI, aim for those 90+%.
-
Evaluating More Coverage in Ruby 3.2
Have you wondered how much of the logic in your views is exercised in your test suite? Thanks to this change, now you can see that in tools like SimpleCov.
-
My First Code Commit in Ruby
My talk is about different best practices - specifically when adhering to them breaks down. One of those best practices is high test coverage. I start to work on the content for my presentation by building the code samples that I want to use in the slides. For the code coverage section, I'm writing some code with some tests. I'm using SimpleCov to generate code coverage results.
- Falha de cobertura: Divagações sobre testes de software
-
Improve Code in Your Ruby Application with RubyCritic
SimpleCov - a tool to check Ruby application code coverage. You can configure it to run alongside your tests. It provides metrics on code coverage so that you can identify what you need to pay attention to and where to invest your time to create better test cases.
-
Paying Down Technical Debt
Ensure that you have sufficient test coverage. You can use code coverage analysis tools like SimpleCov to gain insight into gaps in your coverage.
-
How to test all workers in one big loop?
simplecov might the answer you need, it generates a report of the lines of code your test suite hits.
-
How to Improve Code Quality on a Ruby on Rails Application
Use SimpleCov to generate a report of how many statements are covered by your test suite. It won't assess the test suite quality, though.
-
Ruby's Got You Covered
There are many tools for measuring test coverage, but one is SimpleCov. It also supports branches coverage. To measure coverage of production code, check out Coverband, which you can set up to use oneshot lines mode.
- Como configurar ambiente de testes em Ruby on Rails com RSpec
What are some alternatives?
Ruby style guide - A community-driven Ruby coding style guide
Coverband - Ruby production code coverage collection and reporting (line of code usage)
eslint-config-standard - ESLint Config for JavaScript Standard Style
Rubocop - A Ruby static code analyzer and formatter, based on the community Ruby style guide. [Moved to: https://github.com/rubocop/rubocop]
rubocop-rspec - Code style checking for RSpec files
Rubycritic - A Ruby code quality reporter
ansi-strikethrough - The color strikethrough, in ansi.
undercover - undercover warns about methods, classes and blocks that were changed without tests, to help you easily find untested code and reduce the number of bugs. It does so by analysing data from git diffs, code structure and SimpleCov coverage reports
rubocop-rails - A RuboCop extension focused on enforcing Rails best practices and coding conventions.
Pronto - Quick automated code review of your changes
Hanami::Model - Ruby persistence framework with entities and repositories
rails_best_practices - a code metric tool for rails projects