SimpleCov
Code coverage for Ruby with a powerful configuration library and automatic merging of coverage across test suites (by simplecov-ruby)
Rubycritic
A Ruby code quality reporter (by whitesmith)
Our great sponsors
| SimpleCov | Rubycritic | |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | 4 | |
| 4,707 | 3,289 | |
| 0.2% | 0.7% | |
| 6.5 | 6.3 | |
| 7 days ago | 9 days ago | |
| Ruby | Ruby | |
| MIT License | MIT License |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
SimpleCov
Posts with mentions or reviews of SimpleCov.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-02-02.
-
Must-have gems for mature Rails
gem "simplecov" - https://github.com/simplecov-ruby/simplecov | Gather spec coverage stats locally and on CI, aim for those 90+%.
-
Evaluating More Coverage in Ruby 3.2
Have you wondered how much of the logic in your views is exercised in your test suite? Thanks to this change, now you can see that in tools like SimpleCov.
-
My First Code Commit in Ruby
My talk is about different best practices - specifically when adhering to them breaks down. One of those best practices is high test coverage. I start to work on the content for my presentation by building the code samples that I want to use in the slides. For the code coverage section, I'm writing some code with some tests. I'm using SimpleCov to generate code coverage results.
- Falha de cobertura: Divagações sobre testes de software
-
Improve Code in Your Ruby Application with RubyCritic
SimpleCov - a tool to check Ruby application code coverage. You can configure it to run alongside your tests. It provides metrics on code coverage so that you can identify what you need to pay attention to and where to invest your time to create better test cases.
-
Paying Down Technical Debt
Ensure that you have sufficient test coverage. You can use code coverage analysis tools like SimpleCov to gain insight into gaps in your coverage.
-
How to test all workers in one big loop?
simplecov might the answer you need, it generates a report of the lines of code your test suite hits.
-
How to Improve Code Quality on a Ruby on Rails Application
Use SimpleCov to generate a report of how many statements are covered by your test suite. It won't assess the test suite quality, though.
-
Ruby's Got You Covered
There are many tools for measuring test coverage, but one is SimpleCov. It also supports branches coverage. To measure coverage of production code, check out Coverband, which you can set up to use oneshot lines mode.
- Como configurar ambiente de testes em Ruby on Rails com RSpec
Rubycritic
Posts with mentions or reviews of Rubycritic.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-01-17.
-
First commits in a Ruby on Rails app
The third commit adds Rubycritic as a code quality static analysis.
-
Improve Code in Your Ruby Application with RubyCritic
You should consider using RubyCritic if you want a single place to review code improvements for your project. Including RubyCritic in your development process will certainly reduce the time a development team spends working on technical debts. Most technical debts will be mapped out at development time.
-
Best services and/or gems for automated generation of documentation, unit tests, and useful things of this nature
It's also possible to write unit tests in order to better understand or surface your assumptions about a legacy application. I'd also consider running rubycritic against legacy code, to see where the code smells and other hot spots lie.
-
How to Improve Code Quality on a Ruby on Rails Application
RubyCritic: a gem that wraps around static analysis gems such as Reek, Flay, and Flog to provide a quality report of your Ruby code.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing SimpleCov and Rubycritic you can also consider the following projects:
Coverband - Ruby production code coverage collection and reporting (line of code usage)
Rubocop - A Ruby static code analyzer and formatter, based on the community Ruby style guide. [Moved to: https://github.com/rubocop/rubocop]
Brakeman - A static analysis security vulnerability scanner for Ruby on Rails applications
undercover - undercover warns about methods, classes and blocks that were changed without tests, to help you easily find untested code and reduce the number of bugs. It does so by analysing data from git diffs, code structure and SimpleCov coverage reports
Reek - Code smell detector for Ruby
Pronto - Quick automated code review of your changes
rails_best_practices - a code metric tool for rails projects
MetricFu - A fist full of code metrics
Pippi - pippi
rubocop - A Ruby static code analyzer and formatter, based on the community Ruby style guide.